The inability to have a cancelled process immediately terminate may be
an architectural choice where it is desired that TSM's behavior be
uniform across platforms and devices, so as to have uniform
documentation et al. While it may be straightforward for a TSM module
to terminate a TSM server I/O
t; Tom
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf
> Of Howard Coles
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 11:18 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: Question for the TSM 6.1 beta testers
>
> Well, actually it
at shutdown or termination but can't figure out how to use
the same recovery for a forced process termination.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Howard
Coles
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 11:18 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Su
Well, actually it does "work". A "command" in TSM at the admin console
is more of a "suggestion" with TSM. When you request a cancel of a
process it wants to finish what it's doing if it can so as not to have a
partially processed file. Killing out a process in the middle of a file
transfer mess
