Re: Re: Mig stg question.

2007-11-28 Thread David Bronder
Richard Sims wrote: > > Given that the migration is to serially accessed, sequential media, I > don't see the need for more than one major thread per migration > stream, anyway. In such a context, I see a one-for-one > quantification of threads and processes (where we keep in mind that a > TSM pro

Re: Mig stg question.

2007-11-28 Thread Richard Sims
On Nov 28, 2007, at 1:11 PM, David Bronder wrote: The question wasn't about migration _processes_, but migration _threads_ internal to TSM. As you and Andrew both describe, there are multiple migration _processes_ kicked off in both cases. Given that the migration is to serially accessed, seq

Re: Re: Mig stg question.

2007-11-28 Thread David Bronder
PAC Brion Arnaud wrote: > > Your instructor should read his books again ... The question wasn't about migration _processes_, but migration _threads_ internal to TSM. As you and Andrew both describe, there are multiple migration _processes_ kicked off in both cases. I hadn't heard anything about

Re: Mig stg question.

2007-11-28 Thread PAC Brion Arnaud
Andrew, Here, a snippet of the administrative command line online help "h mig stg" : This command creates one or more migration processes that can be canceled with the CANCEL PROCESS command. The number of processes is limited by the MIGPROCESS attribute of the storage pool definition. To disp