Just to be clear. We DON'T do a move data to tape or disk.
We use the reclamation tape-to-disk (file) feature and then migrate the
data back to tape.
And so if the do a doc it should include:
(4) Reclaim ( tape pool to disk-file and then back to itself)
... joe.f.
Jose
> It would be nice if there was some documentation to explain the practical
> differences in the behaviour of
>
> (1) Reclaim (tape pool to itself)
> (2) Move Data (tape pool to itself)
> (3) Move Data (tape pool to disk pool) followed by Migrate (disk pool to
> tape pool)
Geoff - Send email to t
High and low points of one-drive reclamation:
1) its not move data as far as I know. It looks like this:
Storage Pool Name: TAPEPOOL
Storage Pool Type: Primary
Device Class Name: 3590
Estimated Capacity (MB): 4,149,171.5
.
Joe Faracchio wrote to me:
>Try using a disk-file area and one tape reclamation.
>
>... joe.f.
>
>Joseph A Faracchio, Systems Programmer, UC Berkeley
Hello Joe,
Have you had good results with this technique to speed things up?
It would be nice if there was some documentation to explain the pr
>Date:Mon, 5 Mar 2001 08:45:40 -0500
>From:Richard Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Longlasting tape-reclamation run
>
>Geoff - Greetings from Up Over. ;-)
>
Hello Richard,
Hope you are surviving the blizzard - we don't get many of those in Sydney!
Sorry to be replying so late on this thread, I am just back from
a weeks absence. Collocation clusters are filespaces for ordinary
clients. For api clients like notes they may be filespaces also or something
that equates to a filespace in the database.
Reclaim not only squeezes out the empty sp
ook
through the archives.
Glen Smith
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Longlasting tape-reclamation run
I was interested in the recent items on slow reclamations - see mail
from Richard Sims below.
I started having problems with long-running reclamations about 18 months
ago whe
>Though we may have collocation activated in the server, I believe it to be
> the general case that API-based clients either cannot or do not collocate.
>(This is the case with HSM, at least.) API-based clients which back up
>numerous small client files thus pose a special burden on the server.
Hello Geoff,
Richard Sims wrote:
>
> Geoff - Greetings from Up Over. ;-)
>
> >2. Influence of client type.
> >
> > I have clients of the following types: Novell Netware, Unix, NT, and
> >also NT with the Lotus Notes agent. Since I have collocation on my
> >onsite tape pool, I was able to de
Geoff - Greetings from Up Over. ;-)
>2. Influence of client type.
>
> I have clients of the following types: Novell Netware, Unix, NT, and
>also NT with the Lotus Notes agent. Since I have collocation on my
>onsite tape pool, I was able to determine that the tapes causing trouble
>all belonge
dnesday, February 28, 2001 1:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Longlasting tape-reclamation run
>
>
> > my TSM-server 3.7.2 on AIX 4.3.3 runs a tape-reclamation now for
> >nearly 4 days. Why does it last so long ?
> ...
> >02/28/01 09:26:04
ssage-
From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 February 2001 02:59
Subject: Re: Longlasting tape-reclamation run
> my TSM-server 3.7.2 on AIX 4.3.3 runs a tape-reclamation now for
>nearly 4 days. Why does it last so long ?
...
>02/28/01 09:26:04 ANR114
IL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Richard Sims
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 1:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Longlasting tape-reclamation run
>
>
> > my TSM-server 3.7.2 on AIX 4.3.3 runs a tape-reclamation now for
> >nearly 4 days. Why does
> my TSM-server 3.7.2 on AIX 4.3.3 runs a tape-reclamation now for
>nearly 4 days. Why does it last so long ?
...
>02/28/01 09:26:04 ANR1142I Moving data for collocation cluster 3608
> of 4248 on volume 59.
Peter - What stands out in the above message is the
14 matches
Mail list logo
