Re: Fwd: Re: [ADSM-L] Tape assignments as a mass-flow problem...

2006-01-06 Thread Allen S. Rout
>> On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 17:18:00 -0600, Fred Johanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Do your scripts verify that the volumes are truly scratch? > Yesterday's big discovery was a number of volumes were still > active on a server. I haven't yet seen in the ActLog where > they switch owners. More heads

Re: Fwd: Re: [ADSM-L] Tape assignments as a mass-flow problem...

2006-01-06 Thread Fred Johanson
>Bill Boyer >"Some days you're the bug, some days you're the windshield" - ?? > >-Original Message- >From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allen S. Rout >Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 2:52 PM >To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU

Re: Fwd: Re: [ADSM-L] Tape assignments as a mass-flow problem...

2006-01-06 Thread William Boyer
y, January 06, 2006 2:52 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [ADSM-L] Tape assignments as a mass-flow problem... >> On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:08:32 -0600, Fred Johanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I don't know if your situation is the same as ours, but I've foun

Re: Fwd: Re: [ADSM-L] Tape assignments as a mass-flow problem...

2006-01-06 Thread Allen S. Rout
>> On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:08:32 -0600, Fred Johanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I don't know if your situation is the same as ours, but I've found > that in 5.3.2.1 with a Library Server Manager (ours handles a 3494 > and a 3584 four 4 TSM servers on separate machines) under some > circumstances