Hampshire
603.245.4837
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Del Hoobler [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 11:39 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 TDP-follow-up
>
> Cris, et. al,
>
> Micros
Mehdi,
Look back at the yesterday's appends.
I answered this already.
Thanks,
Del
Del Hoobler
IBM Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Amini, Mehdi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 10/04/2000
10:51:50 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Sto
L PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 TDP-follow-up
I couldn't resist commenting on this subject, again! So here it goes
A few months ago we were getting abit annoyed with TSM and called in some
vendors to looks at their backup products. One was V
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Del Hoobler [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 1:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 TDP-follow-up
Mehdi,
The procedure for restoring a mailbox within
Mehdi,
The procedure for restoring a mailbox within Exchange 2000 will be
to restore the database within the Storage Group that contains the mailbox.
If you are asking about brick-level backup and restore. Then no.
In fact, a Microsoft Exchange project manager was asked about
when the Microsoft
Here is something from the archives I've dug up.
Jack
--
This question was also asked at Microsoft Exchange Conference '99
and Microsoft addressed it by saying that they hold their
position to NOT introduce it into the "backup and restore" API
because of performance issues an
Mehdi,
We are targeting Q1 2001. As usual...no promises.
Thanks,
Del
Del Hoobler
IBM Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Amini, Mehdi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 09/22/2000
11:44:42 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <
