[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 7:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bad performance from tape to tape
Hi *SM-ers!
Maybe this has been stated before, if so I missed that reply.
There is no media on the market that guarantees storage forever... I doubt
you will be able
ears or
so.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Bill Boyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 22:37
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bad performance from tape to tape
The original poster said his disk pool had CACHE=YES
ame SCSI adapter ?
Groet,
Freek.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Boyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: donderdag 15 augustus 2002 17:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bad performance from tape to tape
The tape-to-tape operation that is adversely affected is reclamation. If the
primay
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: donderdag 15 augustus 2002 17:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bad performance from tape to tape
The tape-to-tape operation that is adversely affected is reclamation. If the
primay location of a file is in a random access disk pool, then TSM does not
'batch'
sage-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Joe Pendergast
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 9:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bad performance from tape to tape
Is the disk pool cached?
I ran into a situation where the disk pool cache instead of tape was bei
Is the disk pool cached?
I ran into a situation where the disk pool cache instead of tape was being used.
This slowed my LTO drives to a crawl during certain operations.
I now varyoff the disk pools before I run the process with expected results
Don't forget to vary them back on at the end..
Note:
