Re: Backup stgpool bug

2000-08-10 Thread Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
t, 2000 13:57 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Backup stgpool bug >08/10/2000 00:52:45 ANR1257W Storage pool backup skipping damaged file on >volume 0630A5: Node OD6-VERITAS, Type Backup, File space /data0002, File >name /ora/klapa/dbdata/klapasxb1_1.dbf. ... >State of SUCCESS??

Re: Backup stgpool bug

2000-08-10 Thread Len Boyle
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says: > >Hi *SM-ers! >I discovered a real big problem with TSM (3.7.3 on AIX). >Yesterday I ran a backup stgpool and I came across the following message in >the activity log: > >08/10/2000 00:52:45 ANR1257W Storage pool b

Re: Backup stgpool bug

2000-08-10 Thread Eric Tang
Suppose a file has been backup stgpool once from primary pool TAPEP to copypool TAPEC successfully. My question is: if the file is detected damage while reading primary pool TAPEP during TAPEC reclaimation, will ADSM keep TAPEC for that file image? Thanks in advance. Regards, Eric Tang

Re: Backup stgpool bug

2000-08-10 Thread Richard Sims
>08/10/2000 00:52:45 ANR1257W Storage pool backup skipping damaged file on >volume 0630A5: Node OD6-VERITAS, Type Backup, File space /data0002, File >name /ora/klapa/dbdata/klapasxb1_1.dbf. ... >State of SUCCESS? 0 Unreadable Bytes? This in NOT correct! Eric - This may be one of those interpr

Re: Backup stgpool bug

2000-08-10 Thread Cook, Dwight E
Well, technically they are in sync 'cause the file doesn't exist in either pool ! Granted the damaged file is a problem... Being a .dbf I'm guessing that was an archived file... if it were a "backed up file" TSM, now that the file has been identified as damaged, would back it up during the next