Re: Backup of Remote Sites

2001-04-05 Thread Mark Stapleton
David Nash wrote: >There are several people doing backups of remote sites >across a WAN. Most have commented that they have been >successful. The consensus seems to be that success depends >on the exact situation. Everyone reccomends using client >compression. "It doen't hurt to try it." > >We

Re: Backup of Remote Sites

2001-04-05 Thread David Nash
adesso Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 1:35 PM Subject: Re: Backup of Remote Sites > We do this also with over 150 sites. Normal file restores are not a problem > but if the box fails or corrupts itself then we rebuild a box

Re: Backup of Remote Sites

2001-04-04 Thread Palmadesso Jack
ve to start all over again. Now all sites that warrant their own Exchange Server automatically get their own TSM server. Jack -Original Message- From: David Nash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 1:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Backup of Remote Sites

Re: Backup of Remote Sites

2001-04-04 Thread Prather, Wanda
We do it for some small machines. It works. The answer is, of course "it depends on your situation." These are small machines that aren't terribly critical - if we lost one, we could take 24 hours to rebuild it and the users would still be happy (give that their other choice is to have to recust

Re: Backup of Remote Sites

2001-04-04 Thread Kelly J. Lipp
ght E Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 10:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Backup of Remote Sites Client compression would be very helpful... How big are the boxes ? ? ? and a full restore would take time but the data would be there. I've backed up NT boxes from Atlanta GA into Tulsa OK (I&#x

Re: Backup of Remote Sites

2001-04-04 Thread John Monahan
Most of my remote sites are T1, but I do have 3 that are 256K lines. I do use client compression, but my remote clients are fairly newer hardware so they can handle the extra load. You will have to run some tests to see what is faster, dependent on your particular hardware. One thing to note is

Re: Backup of Remote Sites

2001-04-04 Thread David Nash
- From: "Cook, Dwight E" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 11:37 AM Subject: Re: Backup of Remote Sites > Client compression would be very helpful... > How big are the boxes ? ? ? > and a full restore would take time but

Re: Backup of Remote Sites

2001-04-04 Thread Magura, Curtis
Works for us We back up 20-25 small NT based nodes scattered around the Washington D.C. area to a larger site in Gaithersburg Md. They are all T1 connections. We run with client compression on and overall average about 1 GB per hour on a single T1. Again not something you would want to do for

Re: Backup of Remote Sites

2001-04-04 Thread Cook, Dwight E
Client compression would be very helpful... How big are the boxes ? ? ? and a full restore would take time but the data would be there. I've backed up NT boxes from Atlanta GA into Tulsa OK (I'm pretty sure the nodes are still registered...) they run fine but my network speeds are a little better