Re: 3494 cleaning (2 nd. try)

2003-03-10 Thread Richard Sims
>what is the mtlib command that shows how many cleaning cycles are available >in the library? I used to know it but nothing seems to work now. 3494 cleaner cycles remaining 'mtlib -l /dev/lmcp0 -qL' line: "avail 3590 cleaner cycles" R.

Re: 3494 cleaning (2 nd. try)

2003-03-10 Thread David E Ehresman
CTED]> >Reply-To: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: 3494 cleaning (2 nd. try) >Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 08:49:48 -0800 > >make sure your cleaning volume mask is set properly... >I think by default it is CLN999 &g

Re: 3494 cleaning (2 nd. try)

2003-03-10 Thread James Taylor
van - SPLXM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 10:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 3494 cleaning (2 nd. try) Hi Richard! Thank you very much for not ignoring me this time :-) The output from /usr/bin/mtlib -l $LMCP -vqK -s fffd: Performing Query Inventory Volume Count D

Re: 3494 cleaning (2 nd. try)

2003-03-10 Thread Cook, Dwight E
EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 3494 cleaning (2 nd. try) Hi Richard! Thank you very much for not ignoring me this time :-) The output from /usr/bin/mtlib -l $LMCP -vqK -s fffd: Performing Query Inventory Volume Count Data using /dev/lmcp0 Inventory Volume Count Data: sequence number..10143 n

Re: 3494 cleaning (2 nd. try)

2003-03-10 Thread bbullock
adjust/add to it. I'm not near my library, so I don't recall which menu it's under, but it ~is~ there... :-) Ben -Original Message- From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 9:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 3494

Re: 3494 cleaning (2 nd. try)

2003-03-10 Thread David E Ehresman
> I saw that the cleaning tape was ejected to the bulk >I/O area. So I removed it from the library and I placed a new one in the >bulk I/O area. The library picked it from there and placed it in an empty >cell. I though that that was enough, but apparently not. Is there a special >procedure for che

Re: 3494 cleaning (2 nd. try)

2003-03-10 Thread Richard Sims
>...Is there a special >procedure for checking in a cleaner cartridge? No: you simply toss them into the Convenience I/O station and the library puts them away into arbitrary cells, remembering where they are. I would hazard that the tape you inserted did not have a barcode label prefix matching

Re: 3494 cleaning (2 nd. try)

2003-03-10 Thread Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 16:10 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 3494 cleaning (2 nd. try) >I haven't received an answer yet, so I'll give it another try: We've simply been ignoring you. ;-) >In the IBM Redbook "IBM Magstar Tape Pro

Re: 3494 cleaning (2 nd. try)

2003-03-10 Thread Richard Sims
>I haven't received an answer yet, so I'll give it another try: We've simply been ignoring you. ;-) >In the IBM Redbook "IBM Magstar Tape Products Family: A Practical Guide" I >read the following line: > >For 3590 Magstar drives, use a value of 999 mounts to perform cleaning based >on drive requ

Re: 3494 cleaning (2 nd. try)

2003-03-10 Thread Shannon Bach
We had a cleaning problem with our 3590 Magstar a few months ago. Here is what we did though I don't know if yours is set up the same way. We did find out that the cleaning default 'preset' in the Library was not initiating cleaning. In the Magstar Library under Commands pull-down, then Cleaning

Re: 3494 cleaning (2 nd. try)

2003-03-10 Thread Cook, Dwight E
Eric, did you double check that you still have cleaning cycles left on your cleaning tape(s) ? > mtlib -l/dev/lmcp3 -qL | more Library Data: operational state..Automated Operational State functional state...00 input stations.1 output stations...

Re: 3494 cleaning (2 nd. try)

2003-03-10 Thread Christian Svensson
Hi Eric! I don´t know if this help you. Maybe the library take up the cleaning b