Re: 'Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed' clarrification

2003-10-14 Thread Gordon Woodward
ECTED] Sent by: cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: 'Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed' clarrification EDU 14/10/2003 04:09 PM Pl

Re: 'Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed' clarrification

2003-10-13 Thread Deon George
Gordon, The data will stay in the existing storage pool until it is moved manually... BTW: Rebinding applies to data retention (ie: number of versions and days to keep), and actually refers to files being "re-attached" to a new (different) management class. So, changing the details of a managem

Re: 'Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed' clarrification

2003-10-13 Thread Gordon Woodward
: 'Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed' clarrification 10/10/2003 06:06 PM Please respond to ADSM-L Gordon, Maxscratch is just a value you set high enough to prevent failures due to running out of storage. It will not use more tapes Look

Re: 'Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed' clarrification

2003-10-13 Thread Gordon Woodward
nt by:cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: 'Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed' clarrification 10/10/2003 06:06 PM Please respond to ADSM-L Gordon, Maxscratch is just a value you set

Re: 'Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed' clarrification

2003-10-10 Thread John Naylor
Gordon, Maxscratch is just a value you set high enough to prevent failures due to running out of storage. It will not use more tapes Look at your reuse delay values Try a move data against the 6 empty filling tapes The number of filling tapes in a collocated pool should bear some relationship to ei