Roger
Worth mentioning is that the issue is most likely compounded by the
migration/reclamation process running during a backup, the performance hit to
the TSM server can be severe.
You may find a significant reduction in task processing times if you do isolate
them.
In the past I have
L.
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 9:34 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Migration should preempt reclamation
This is a tough one. On the one hand we want Reclamation to use as many tape
drives as possible, but not consume them all. We also have multiple TSM
instances wanti
as under the impression that higher priority tasks could preempt
> lower priority tasks. That is, migration should be able to preempt
> reclamation. But it doesn't. A very careful reading of Administrator's
> Guide tells me that it does not.
>
> We're having a problem
This is a tough one. On the one hand we want Reclamation to use as many tape
drives as possible, but not consume them all. We also have multiple TSM
instances wanting library resources. The TSM instances are blind to each
others needs. This _IS_ difficult to control.
The _current_ solution
Could you reduce the "Reclamation Processes" count on the storagepool by one
leaving a tape drive free for migration?
David
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Roger
Deschner
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 8:43 PM
I was under the impression that higher priority tasks could preempt
lower priority tasks. That is, migration should be able to preempt
reclamation. But it doesn't. A very careful reading of Administrator's
Guide tells me that it does not.
We're having a problem with a large cli
If you could post sanitized actlog entries related to that process number,
it might help.
George Huebschman (George H.)
(301) 699-4013
(301) 875-1227 (Cell)
From:
Tom Taylor
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
04/14/14 02:49 PM
Subject:
Re: [ADSM-L] reclamation
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist Stor Ma
Subject:
Re: [ADSM-L] reclamation
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
How did you get reclamation to run?
Did you use storage pool settings or did you run a reclamation command?
George Huebschman (George H.)
(301) 699-4013
(301) 875-1227 (Cell)
The contents of this email are the p
How did you get reclamation to run?
Did you use storage pool settings or did you run a reclamation command?
George Huebschman (George H.)
(301) 699-4013
(301) 875-1227 (Cell)
The contents of this email are the property of PNC. If it was not addressed to
you, you have no legal right to read it
TSM regards the tape as "FULL" once it reaches full status, and until data
is completed expired, deleted, or moved off of it.
Your reclamation process might have been successful if it had a time limit
and reached the end.
As others have suggested, try doing a "move data" on t
So new question then... I made a temp storagepool using my tape library,
reclamation picked up and ran, the actlog says that one of the reclaims
was successful. when I look at the volume reclaimed its utilization is
down to 17%, but it is still marked as "full" so I still can't use
Thank you everyone, all of this was very helpful. I am new to TSM and
honestly still have no idea what I am doing. I think I have resolved my
issue. On disk I had literally no volumes with space but I added some
scratch tapes to my library and created a temporary reclamation pool using
the library
I think next sequence of actions can help:
1) change some policy sets to reduce expire period (some old data will be
lost!) ;
2) activate policy set;
3) run "expiry inventory" and, maybe, some volumes will become empty to start
reclamation.
Good luck!
Grigori Solonovitch, Seni
One more thing to consider is you can move some tapes out of the
library by using "move media" command. Lets say that you had a bunch
at a 100% capacity that does require reclamation, you can eject those,
and add scratch tapes. (assuming you have some free tapes as well)
move media v
day, April 14, 2014 12:20 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] reclamation
Actually doing the Move data command doesn't require any scratch tapes at all.
Have done it a ton of times as we run out of scratch/space all of the time.
It's a never ending battle here!!
Regards,
, you could conceivably plug in some inexpensive random
access media to constitute a temporary storage pool to be able to initiate
reclamation. NFS mounting is another way to get space.
Richard Sims
It can also use filling volumes, but it can't use empty space on full
volumes without reclamation. If there are a bunch of almost-empty full
volumes, though, even one scratch tape could free up a bunch more scratch
volumes using MOVE or RECLAIM.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 04:20:17PM +, Le
asAir, Inc.
matthew.leon...@atlasair.com
914-701-8042
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Skylar
Thompson
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 12:03 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] reclamation
This depends on having so
: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] reclamation
No, that is my problem. I am in kind of a tight spot and we have had numerous
Admins leave recently all at once. TSM server has not been attended to lately
as it should and has gotten out of hand... so no there is literally NO disk or
tape
> 914-701-8042
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Tom
> Taylor
> Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 11:46 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] reclamation
>
> No, that is my problem. I am in
n Behalf Of Tom
Taylor
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 11:46 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] reclamation
No, that is my problem. I am in kind of a tight spot and we have had numerous
Admins leave recently all at once. TSM server has not been attended to lately
as it should a
Hmm, this is a tricky situation. The only way you can use delete without
reclamation is to free up entire volumes - just deleting files or
filespaces are likely to free up partial volumes, but without reclamation
there's no way to take advantage of that.
Another option would be buying some
be space if reclamation ran, because I have a lot of
reclaimable space, but there is nowhere for the reclamation process to put
the files that are good on the reclaimable volumes I'm kind of stuck
here.
Thomas Taylor
System Administrator
Jos. A. Bank Clothiers
Cell (443)-974-5768
Can you provide some space in a DISK or FILE pool, and then set
RECLAIMSTGPOOL for the pool that's completely out of space? That will allow
reclamation to use space emporarily in the referenced pool.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:33:04AM -0400, Tom Taylor wrote:
> In a situation where rec
In a situation where reclamation will not run because there is literally
no space left in any pool, how do I get the reclaimable space back from
volumes that have reclaimable space? Is there a way I can manually delete
expired data from a volume directly?
Thomas Taylor
System Administrator
=readwri
ANR2208I Volume S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\16AA.BFS deleted from storage pool
ACTIVEPOOL-FILE.
ANR1341I Scratch volume S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\16AA.BFS has been deleted from
storage pool ACTIVEPOOL-FILE.
The volume was deleted, i'am see if i have another problem of space reclamation.
Re
.EDU] De la part de mik
Envoyé : jeudi 12 décembre 2013 11:10
À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Objet : [ADSM-L] Space reclamation is ended for volume
Hi Eric van Loon and thanks for the reply,
I have already try the audit volume and audit volume fix=yes and no error on th
file, i don"t understand.
Hi Eric van Loon and thanks for the reply,
I have already try the audit volume and audit volume fix=yes and no error on th
file, i don"t understand.
Regars, Mickael.
+--
|This was sent by bobpatrick808...@yahoo.fr via Backup Ce
full
backup for that TDP client a.s.a.p.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
mik
Sent: donderdag 12 december 2013 9:54
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Space reclamation is ende
E_DEVCLASS\3649.BFS.
In the console i see that
____
ANR1040I Space reclamation started for volume
S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\16AA.BFS, storage pool ACTIVEPOOL-FILE (process number
1497).
ANR1
@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Space reclamation is ended for volume
Hi everybody,
My problem
__
ANRD_1627081930 (ssrecons.c:784) Thread<52>: Byte count mismatch for object
0.206273217 source: 0.62939, target: 0.920075 (PROCESS: 327) ANRD
Thread<52> issued messa
Hi everybody,
My problem
__
ANRD_1627081930 (ssrecons.c:784) Thread<52>: Byte count mismatch for object
0.206273217 source: 0.62939, target: 0.920075 (PROCESS: 327)
ANRD Thread<52> issued message from: (PROCESS: 327)
ANR1092E Space reclamation
the trouble.
The above APAR was created shortly after my PMR was closed.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Tim
Brown
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 7:08 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] ANR1162W Space reclamat
Seeing these errors on replicated TSM server during reclaim process, both
servers have been upgraded recently to 6.3.3
ANR1162W Space reclamation skipping damaged file on volume
D:\WIN2K_PRIM2\0001A370.BFS: Node NEREUS, Type Backup, File space
\\nereus\d$, File name
\STELLENT\IDCM1\WEBLAYOUT
: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 10:46 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Reclamation of Virtual Tapes
I have a Data Domain 880 with 42 active disks, 6 spares, and 4 system disks.
Capacity is 64,678.1 GB.
Jim Schneider
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Reclamation of Virtual Tapes
My experience with DataDomain (VTL option) is different than Jim described. I
have 2 TSM servers (P6 hardware) using 1 DD. We have not seen a performance
difference no matter what is running beyond what you would expect as the 12Gb
(ISLs
operation for the pool
that has the data to prevent contention.
Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Alex
Paschal
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2012 4:31 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Reclamation of
Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Alex
Paschal
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2012 4:31 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Reclamation of Virtual Tapes
Pierre, Jim, having read your observation of read performance impact with your
Data Domain and your DXi, do you
of backups to VTL drops when
the DXi "rehydrates" the deduplicated/compressed virtual tapes. I can imagine
the reclamation process does the same thing. There is a need to adjust maintanance
schedules to avoid the situation.
Pierre Billaudeau
Analyste en stockage
Livraison des Infra
I noticed a serious performance drop when our backup primary tapes to copypool
runs at night (VTL Quantum DXi8500 to TS1140 tapes). The throughput of backups
to VTL drops when the DXi "rehydrates" the deduplicated/compressed virtual
tapes. I can imagine the reclamation process doe
Our primary (and only) storage is a Data Domain. Be careful when reclaiming
virtual tapes. It works perfectly but servers backing up to the Data Domain
have their bandwidth throughput drop from 85% to 5% during reclamation. This
was determined by watching Windows Task Manager network
@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Reclamation of Virtual Tapes
Sounds like someone set the reclaim storage pool on the virtual tape pool to
the physical tape pool.
I know of no reason why not to reclaim virtual tapes.
Wish I had one to play with.
Gary Lee
Senior System Programmer
Ball State University
-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Welton, Charles
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 11:10 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Reclamation of Virtual Tapes
Hello:
We have a TSM instance that uses virtual tapes as our primary backup data pool.
The
Hello:
We have a TSM instance that uses virtual tapes as our primary backup data pool.
The data on the virtual tapes are eventually migrated to tape. We are
currently down to 3 virtual scratch tapes and 6 physical scratch tapes. I
noticed that we are not running any reclamation processes on
endthreadex()+43
> ANRD Thread<32> 73211E3B endthreadex()+df
> ANRD Thread<32> 76D5652D BaseThreadInitThunk()+d
> ANRD Thread<32> 76E8C521 RtlUserThreadStart()+21
> ANR9999D_1147918115 RclmOffsiteVols(afrclm.c:2975) Thread<32>: Er
I just started a reclamation process to make sure but all I get is a message
saying that the reclamation process started then the errors show up.
Looks like call to IBM is next...
David Tyree
Interface Analyst
South Georgia Medical Center
229.333.1155
-Original Message
t;32> 73211D9F endthreadex()+43
ANRD Thread<32> 73211E3B endthreadex()+df
ANRD Thread<32> 76D5652D BaseThreadInitThunk()+d
ANRD Thread<32> 76E8C521 RtlUserThreadStart()+21
ANRD_1147918115 RclmOffsiteVols(afrclm.c:2975) Thread
Hi David.
When you run reclamation on your offsite volumes, what is the command you run?
You also said you get a few tapes back, but that you get error.
What error message are you constantly getting?
And, last but not least, you mention that a lot of the offsite volumes have a
percent
Sorry might be a misunderstanding here.
I don't have an offsite server. I trying to do reclamation on offsite volumes
or trying too.
I get a few tapes back sometimes but I'm constantly getting that error message.
A lot of the offsite volumes have a percent utilization of less tha
David,
If cartridges aren't coming back, you may need to run 'reconcile volumes' .
Don't combine 'reconcile volumes' of a virtual-volume based copypool on the
on-site server with reclamation of the primary target pool on the offsite
server.
tsm:> reconcile
00073211D9F endthreadex()+43
ANRD Thread<32> 73211E3B endthreadex()+df
ANRD Thread<32> 76D5652D BaseThreadInitThunk()+d
ANRD Thread<32> 76E8C521 RtlUserThreadStart()+21
ANRD_1147918115 RclmOffsiteVols(afrclm.c:2975) Thread<32>: Error 3051
qu
On Feb 10, 2012, at 6:53 PM, Robert A. Clark wrote:
> Has anyone seen any documentation from Tivoli, stating that a file
> integrity check (or CRC check) is performed during the reclamation
> process?
Technote 1079385 says no.
Has anyone seen any documentation from Tivoli, stating that a file
integrity check (or CRC check) is performed during the reclamation
process?
(In an LTO-4 pool in this case, on TSM 5.5 on AIX.)
Thanks,
[RC]
If you are not the intended addressee, please inform us immediately that you
have
[mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Prather, Wanda
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 1:38 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] reclamation question
Or just mark them offsite, even though they are still in the library.
You could create a script that does "update vol * wherestgpool=onsit
On occasion I have deleted a vol from a copypool when the percent utilized
number dropped to a couple of percent. In our setup we have three identical
data pools so we should ok but it's not something I do very often.
I have watched the offsite reclamation process sit there for most of an
cess=offsite" before you start reclamation, then reverse it when reclamation
>finishes.
>
>W
>
>-Original Message-
>From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee,
>Gary D.
>Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 1:26 PM
>To: ADSM-L@V
approach.
The reclamation of offsite copy pool tapes can put a drag on your TSM server,
as the processing involves inventorying the files on the offsite tape to be
reclaimed, then identifying the onsite tapes containing the files, and compile
that into a list ordered so as to minimize mounts and
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
Datum: 04/11/2011 18:53
Ärende: reclamation question
We have three storage pools, the primary pool is a devtype FILE
and the two copy pools are devtype LTO3. The offsite copy pools gets
transferred offsite via DRM.
Whenever I run a
Or just mark them offsite, even though they are still in the library.
You could create a script that does "update vol * wherestgpool=onsitecopy
access=offsite" before you start reclamation, then reverse it when reclamation
finishes.
W
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist St
Subject: [ADSM-L] reclamation question
We have three storage pools, the primary pool is a devtype FILE
and the two copy pools are devtype LTO3. The offsite copy pools gets
transferred offsite via DRM.
Whenever I run a reclamation on the offsite copy pool the
We have three storage pools, the primary pool is a devtype FILE
and the two copy pools are devtype LTO3. The offsite copy pools gets
transferred offsite via DRM.
Whenever I run a reclamation on the offsite copy pool the
system grabs a scratch tape and then copies
tapes, but
about 500 tapes that are 98% reclaimable. If I do NOT specify a
offsitereclaimlimit number it seems to process tapes to reclaim at about
3 tapes per minute. So for 500 tapes it just sits there for about 3
HOURS before it even starts mounting tapes to start the reclamation.
I stumbled
ld you know any reason why?
In most of the cases I've examined, it is because the now-onsite tape begins
with a segmented Physical File which is continued from a tape which is not
available (e.g., marked Offsite), where the reclamation then runs with primary
storage pool tapes only as it
Bringing offsite tapes back and reclaiming them onsite is much faster; but, of
course, then that data is not offsite.
Richard Sims http://people.bu.edu/rbs/
Richard, from time to time I've had to do this. After checking in the tapes
and updating them to r/o or r/w TSM doesn't always u
I started a reclamation on that pool yesterday afternoon and it sat
there for several hours before it finally started moving anything.
I guess I got behind doing the reclamation. But that doesn't make any
sense because the offsite pool and the onsite pool have the same
settings and the
> I'm doing a move data now. Or trying too.
> The process has been running for about 30 minutes with zero bytes moved.
> Nothing showing from a q request, nothing showing from a q mount. All drives
> online and plenty of mount points.
Have you tried to use straight command in foreground mode "m
After about an hour of waiting the move data finally got rolling.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Richard Sims
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 2:12 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] reclamation no longer working
On
>> On Thu, 6 May 2010 11:11:34 -0400, "Tyree, David"
>> said:
> I've run the threshold up and down from a few percentage points up
> to 80-90% hoping something would change but no difference. I have
> plenty of scratch tapes and mount points.
Try running one at 99% and _no_ time limit, and exp
On May 6, 2010, at 1:48 PM, Tyree, David wrote:
> I'm doing a move data now. Or trying too.
>
> The process has been running for about 30 minutes with zero bytes moved.
> Nothing showing from a q request, nothing showing from a q mount. All drives
> online and plenty of mount points.
>
> I w
DU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] reclamation no longer working
I recomend you do a move data with 99% tapes.
Regards
Jorge
> Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 11:11:34 -0400
> From: david.ty...@sgmc.org
> Subject: [ADSM-L] reclamation no longer working
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
>
>
It's on the calender
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Rick Adamson
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 1:20 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] reclamation no longer working
David,
Seeing as there have been many,
David,
Seeing as there have been many, many, fixes since you release I would
consider an upgrade to at least the most recent version of 5.4
As a matter of fact a couple of the 5.4.1.1 apars were reclamation
related.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21273797
Thank you,
~Rick
Nope, no mention of waiting on a tape and/or volume
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Rick Adamson
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 11:29 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] reclamation no longer working
When you query
t:
[ADSM-L] reclamation no longer working
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
TSM server 5.4.1.0 running on Windows 2003.
I have an offsite copypool that has decided to no longer
do reclamation. I noticed that I had far more tapes in that pool that I
wo
I recomend you do a move data with 99% tapes.
Regards
Jorge
> Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 11:11:34 -0400
> From: david.ty...@sgmc.org
> Subject: [ADSM-L] reclamation no longer working
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
>
> TSM server 5.4.1.0 running on Windows 2003.
>
Behalf Of
Tyree, David
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 11:12 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] reclamation no longer working
TSM server 5.4.1.0 running on Windows 2003.
I have an offsite copypool that has decided to no longer
do reclamation. I noticed that I
TSM server 5.4.1.0 running on Windows 2003.
I have an offsite copypool that has decided to no longer
do reclamation. I noticed that I had far more tapes in that pool that I
would have expected. I checked the pct_utilized numbers and saw that the
tapes varied from
Hello Colleagues,
I have found all answer to my questions. And from my point of view are very
interesting and I would like to share with all TSMpeople.
1.- When one volume is reclaimed in this pool ( Pool with CG). How TSM does the
reclamation? moving files from one node from Volume to Scratch
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Francisco Molero wrote:
>
>
> 2.- When TSM restores files from these tapes. Does it restore all files in
> a sequential way ?. I mean TSM is reading the tape from the beginning and if
> it finds files to belong to this TSM Client fr
nager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Wolfgang J Moeller
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 6:07 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Collocation Groups Reclamation and Restore
Fred Johanson writes:
> > Once a tape has been mounted for a collocation group's data,
> > all n
er member
> of the CG, so they go to scratch.
>
> As for reclamation, this morning I removed a client. 2 of its volumes
> popped to the top of the list of reclamation candidates (2 reclamation
> processes).
> One went to the expected collector. The second went to scratch.
OK, I me
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Wolfgang J Moeller
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 8:51 AM
To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Collocation Groups Reclamation and Restore
Francisco Molero writes:
>[...] I have s
Francisco Molero writes:
>[...] I have some questions about Collocation Groups Reclamation and restore.
>
> First, my environment I have a Tape STGpool with 3 Collocation Groups and 10
> nodes per Group.
>
> 1.- When one volume is reclaimed in this pool. How TSM does the reclama
Hi TSMers,
I have some questions about Collocation Groups Reclamation and restore.
First, my environment I have a Tape STGpool with 3 Collocation Groups and 10
nodes per Group.
1.- When one volume is reclaimed in this pool. How TSM does the reclamation?
moving files from one node from
Hi to all
Did anyone already wrote a macro or script to calculate how much data is
expired after running "expire inv" and want to share it.
I already have a script giving me the reclaim pct of each volumes but need to
figure the global percent of data that can be reclaim.
Thanks in A
2:02 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Reclamation for offsite storage pools
Hi George,
Will it restart if there are more than 4 tapes that meet the criteria of being
at least 98% empty? (Just following my example.)
Or will it just stop after it does 4 and not start another
You might be running into what I've seen if you are performing your
reclamation via RECLaim STGpool. If you have many very low utilized tapes
and you do not use an OFFSITERECLAIMLIMIT then it is possible that the
reclamation process will only yield another tape going off site and none
coming
x27;s reclaim threshold is 98%. I'm not entering
a command to trigger the reclamation process.
Am I handling this incorrectly? Should I be entering a command to do this
instead of changing the copy storage pool?
Just let me know. Thanks again!
Storage Pool Name: COPY_AIX
Hi,
I am updating the copy pool so it's reclaim threshold is 98%. I'm not entering
a command to trigger the reclamation process.
Am I handling this incorrectly? Should I be entering a command to do this
instead of changing the copy storage pool?
Just let me know. Th
space
requirement.)
Just let me know. Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Huebschman, George J.
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 3:00 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Reclamation for offsite storage pools
It is a
essage-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 9:58 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Reclamation for offsite storage pools
Also look at reclaim stg Copy_Pool th=50 OFFSITERECLAIMLimit=4
Thi
It is a command that runs until it reclaims 4 tapes, then it stops.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Moyer, Joni M
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 2:56 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Reclamation for offsite
are accomplishing.
Thanks again!
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 9:58 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Reclamation for offsite storage pools
Also look at
Hi everyone,
I want to thank you for all of your suggestions and support! I have already
begun to update some parameters so that I can get more efficient reclamation
running and get caught up to where I need to be.
Thanks again!
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Reclamation for offsite storage pools
Hello everyone,
For several years I had not been able to run reclamation on one of my tsm
servers due to the lack of physical tape drives to accomplish the task. I am
in the process of trying to get caught up, but it
e respond to
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
ADSM-L
cc
Subject
[ADSM-L] Reclamation for offsite storage pools
Hello everyone,
For several years I had not been able to run reclamation on one of my tsm
servers due to the lack of physical tape drives to accomplish the task. I
am in the process of
I totally agree on this. At one time, we had such a time with offsite
reclamation, we would set it to 99, then have a script run checking for
reclamation processes, and bump the number down by 1 if there were none. A
hack, to be sure, but we eventually caught up.
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:31 AM
ng
lots of tapes back.
See Ya'
Howard Coles Jr.
John 3:16!
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Moyer, Joni M
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 8:08 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Reclamation for offsite st
Hi George,
When you get behind with reclamation, you end up with many volumes with low
util/high reclaim values. TSM trys to minimize tape mounts by reclaiming
offsite data from your onsite tapes without too many remounts, which can
pull data related to several/(or many) offsite volumes. You can
Joni,
Yes it does. I was just pointing out that with the move data
command, you specify the volumes, whereas with reclamation, TSM does the
prework of selecting volumes. This can be time consuming, as David
points out.
Geo
IMPORTANT: E-mail sent through the Internet is not secure
1 - 100 of 853 matches
Mail list logo
