Hi Paul,
we run AIX, W2K3 and Sun-TSM-Servers. A modern Win-TSM is great for TSM up
to mid-size setups and performance should not be an issue in your projected
environment. If it´s a Windows shop, stick to the os you know you can
handle. We run a couple of them with various IBM libraries including
>> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:49:01 +0200, Henrik Wahlstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> said:
> I couldn't resist to make some minor comments.
> First one is Linux, not AIX.
Ask Zoltan about that. :)
- Allen S. Rout
aintenance.
Cheers,
Neil
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Rhodes
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 9:48 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Once more Windows vs. AIX server
> I wrote a report including the points me
lf Of
Paul van Dongen
Sent: den 30 augusti 2007 15:01
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Once more Windows vs. AIX server
Hello all,
I know this subject comes again from time to time, but I was faced
not with the dilemma, but with "how to say it":
I've got a customer
> I wrote a report including the points mentioned above and some more (I/O
> performance, raw devices, quick etherchannel, easy expansion as they are
> targeting a p520, mksysb, LPAR, dynamic reconfiguration) but would like
> to hear from you if I forgot something really big that could be "the
> po
Hello all,
I know this subject comes again from time to time, but I was faced
not with the dilemma, but with "how to say it":
I've got a customer (long time customer, since 4.1) who is planning
their upgrade. They are still at 5.2 level, and are going to 5.4.1. They
are a Windows sho
