Re: Offsite reclamation problem

2008-11-06 Thread Bob Levad (641-585-6770)
4:11 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Offsite reclamation problem That works if the primary and copy tape pools are in the same library. With people using multiple logical libraries (with encrypted tape drives for the offsite pool) it isn't necessarily an easy win. I'd ra

Re: Offsite reclamation problem

2008-11-05 Thread Clark, Robert A
n one more drive. YMMV. [RC] -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Levad (641-585-6770) Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 10:28 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Offsite reclamation problem I've always liked runn

Re: Offsite reclamation problem

2008-11-04 Thread Howard Coles
earned this over time and experience more so than the book. See Ya' Howard > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Schneider, John > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 2:36 PM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > S

Re: Offsite reclamation problem

2008-11-04 Thread Schneider, John
ay, November 04, 2008 1:02 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Offsite reclamation problem Yes, look up the "mount options" option in the device class (In ISC). You can set this to a hard number, such as in the case we've been speaking of to 8 or 9 (for 2 or 1 drive free), or a

Re: Offsite reclamation problem

2008-11-04 Thread Howard Coles
e library". See Ya' Howard > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Schneider, John > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 12:35 PM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Offsite reclamation problem

Re: Offsite reclamation problem

2008-11-04 Thread Howard Coles
11:52 AM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Offsite reclamation problem > > Still kinda strange that TSM can't simply pause a task instead of > blundly canceling it. > > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROT

Re: Offsite reclamation problem

2008-11-04 Thread Neil Schofield
Thomas There are a couple of ways to initiate reclamation. I presume from your description that you are scheduling a RECLAIM STGPOOL THRESHOLD=x command. The other way I can think of is to schedule an UPDATE STGPOOL RECLAIM=x command. We use the former instead of the latter because it means we ca

Re: Offsite reclamation problem

2008-11-04 Thread Schneider, John
t: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 11:57 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Offsite reclamation problem Lots of people have a best-practice of always keeping at least one drive free for user restores. That minimizes the problem. It makes users happy too, because even though a restore d

Re: Offsite reclamation problem

2008-11-04 Thread Bob Levad (641-585-6770)
say morris Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 11:57 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Offsite reclamation problem Lots of people have a best-practice of always keeping at least one drive free for user restores. That minimizes the problem. It makes users happy too, because even though a r

Re: Offsite reclamation problem

2008-11-04 Thread Conway, Timothy
from segregating them? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bos, Karel Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 10:22 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Offsite reclamation problem No :) -Original Message- From: ADSM:

Re: Offsite reclamation problem

2008-11-04 Thread lindsay morris
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Denier Sent: dinsdag 4 november 2008 18:14 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Offsite reclamation problem We have a 5.4.2.0 TSM server running under mainframe Linux. We have five tape drives available for our primary tape storage pool and five tape drives available for our

Re: Offsite reclamation problem

2008-11-04 Thread Bos, Karel
sday, November 04, 2008 11:22 AM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Offsite reclamation problem > > No :) > > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Thomas Denier > Sent: dinsdag

Re: Offsite reclamation problem

2008-11-04 Thread Mark Stapleton
r 04, 2008 11:22 AM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Offsite reclamation problem > > No :) > > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Thomas Denier > Sent: dinsdag 4 november 2008 1

Re: Offsite reclamation problem

2008-11-04 Thread Bos, Karel
No :) -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Denier Sent: dinsdag 4 november 2008 18:14 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Offsite reclamation problem We have a 5.4.2.0 TSM server running under mainframe Linux. We have five tape

Offsite reclamation problem

2008-11-04 Thread Thomas Denier
We have a 5.4.2.0 TSM server running under mainframe Linux. We have five tape drives available for our primary tape storage pool and five tape drives available for our copy storage pool. We run offsite tape reclaimation with 'maxproc=5'. If a client runs a restore while off reclamation is going on,