ase
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
message.
TSM_User
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
02/09/2005 09:12 PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Number of HBA's
"
;
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Number of HBA's
"but why design to do that?" For the very practical reason that money
doesn't grow on trees.
If someone were to purchase and IBM 3584 with 12 LTO3 drives would we
suggest that they use 12 HBA's or 6 dual port
n - SPLXM"
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
02/09/2005 02:13 AM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Number of HBA's
Hi Orville!
I don't think this is really necessary since LTO2. LTO1 performance does
suff
-mail and destroy all copies of the original
message.
"Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
02/09/2005 02:13 AM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Number of HBA'
Sent by:cc
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager" Subject
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Number of HBA's
IST.EDU>
02/09/2005
03:59 AM
Stef Coene wrote:
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 21:10, Ben Bullock wrote:
The documents say you are supposed to NOT have SAN and tape
devices running on the same HBAs.
Mhh, can you point me to a paper stating this? I can't find any.
I can find the rule that a tape drive must be on a separate zone fr
Perhaps, IBM site Technote 1194590.
On Feb 9, 2005, at 6:39 AM, Stef Coene wrote:
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 21:10, Ben Bullock wrote:
The documents say you are supposed to NOT have SAN and tape
devices running on the same HBAs.
Mhh, can you point me to a paper stating this? I can't find any.
I
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 21:10, Ben Bullock wrote:
> The documents say you are supposed to NOT have SAN and tape
> devices running on the same HBAs.
Mhh, can you point me to a paper stating this? I can't find any.
I can find the rule that a tape drive must be on a separate zone from the
disks.
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 00:33, Mark D. Rodriguez wrote:
> Stef,
>
> There are several ways to accomplish this. However,, you didn't give us
> all the details so I will make some assumptions. I will assume you are
> using at least 2 switches for redundant paths. I will assume that the
> ora
st regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Orville Lantto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 21:33
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Number of HBA's
Don't forget drive compression when making throughput calculat
Are these HBA's connected to a 1 GB or 2 GB SAN infrastructure? When
determining how many drives to put on a single HBA also consider the likely
load not the total possible load. If you are doing full database backups all
day long then you may need to ensure you can get total throughput from e
Stef,
There are several ways to accomplish this. However,, you didn't give us
all the details so I will make some assumptions. I will assume you are
using at least 2 switches for redundant paths. I will assume that the
oracle backup is meant to be Lan-Free directly to tape.
I would zone the SAN
"
02/08/2005 02:10 PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Number of HBA's
The documents say you are supposed to NOT have SAN and
tape
devices running on the same HBAs.
I would expect yo
Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Stef Coene
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 1:03 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Number of HBA's
Hi,
For a setup with:
- 4 x LTO3 drives in a IBM 3583 library
- 1 oracle database server: 40GB/1hr archives
Hi,
For a setup with:
- 4 x LTO3 drives in a IBM 3583 library
- 1 oracle database server: 40GB/1hr archives that needs to backuped (AIX
LPAR) over the SAN
- 1 TSM server (AIX LPAR)
What with the HBA's? Is it needed to split the tape and disk activity and to
put 4 HBA's in the oracle DB (2 HBA's
15 matches
Mail list logo
