Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 3:44 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Moving to TSM Capacity based licensing from PVU -
experiences
Ian,
Our company looked into it and thought it may save some $$ and at the same
time simplify the OVERLY complex PVU license model used for TSM/IBM.
I&#x
remember, IBM is run by layers and bookkeeper. So, development made great
software, and then legal got to say something about it.
On 18 jul. 2012, at 19:37, Prather, Wanda wrote:
> Woot!!! How can they release this stuff with a straight face ?!??!!
>
> W
>
>
>
> -Keith Arbogast wrote: -
Woot!!! How can they release this stuff with a straight face ?!??!!
W
-Keith Arbogast wrote: -
>For those who are wavering between that and PVU based, it may help,
>depending on your client mix, to know that the 6.3 client reports
>Processor Vendor, Processor Brand, Processor Type,
ny thanks once again.
Ian Smith
Oxford University
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] on behalf of Thomas Denier
[thomas.den...@jeffersonhospital.org]
Sent: 17 July 2012 16:19
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Moving to TSM Capa
-Keith Arbogast wrote: -
>For those who are wavering between that and PVU based, it may help,
>depending on your client mix, to know that the 6.3 client reports
>Processor Vendor, Processor Brand, Processor Type, Processor Model
>and Processor Count. So, one doesn't need to install the Li
Ian et al;
We have a Capacity Based license now, and so far so good.
For those who are wavering between that and PVU based, it may help, depending
on your client mix, to know that the 6.3 client reports Processor Vendor,
Processor Brand, Processor Type, Processor Model and Processor Count. So,
VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Rick
> Adamson
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 8:44 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Moving to TSM Capacity based licensing from PVU -
> experiences
>
> Ian,
> Our company looked into it and thought it may save some $$ and at the
or Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Rick Adamson
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 2:05 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Moving to TSM Capacity based licensing from PVU -
> experiences
>
> Steve,
> Perhaps I should have stated YMMV as our
ailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Rick
Adamson
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 2:05 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Moving to TSM Capacity based licensing from PVU -
experiences
Steve,
Perhaps I should have stated YMMV as our negotiation with IBM took place when
the cap mo
onday, July 16, 2012 8:44 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Moving to TSM Capacity based licensing from PVU -
experiences
Ian,
Our company looked into it and thought it may save some $$ and at the
same time simplify the OVERLY complex PVU license model used for
TSM/IBM.
I'll
.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Ian
Smith
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 7:13 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Moving to TSM Capacity based licensing from PVU -
experiences
Hi,
We are in the midst of discussions on moving to capacity-based licensing from
the standard PVU-based method f
44 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Moving to TSM Capacity based licensing from PVU -
experiences
Ian,
Our company looked into it and thought it may save some $$ and at the same time
simplify the OVERLY complex PVU license model used for TSM/IBM.
I'll start by sayi
city based licensing is more easy to
calculate than the PVU based.
Regards,
Kurt
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] Namens Ian Smith
Verzonden: maandag 16 juli 2012 13:13
Aan: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Onderwerp: Re: [ADSM-L] Moving to TSM Capa
We recently converted to a special hybrid license that is a combination of
PVU and STG based. We are ~600TB primary occupancy (constantly growing)
but have a lot of high-powered multi-processor systems (in research
computing) so it worked out cheaper (per my guy who does licensing) to go
to the S
t no such provision for Data Domain.
Good luck
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Ian Smith
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 7:13 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Moving to TSM Capacity based licensing from PV
@VM.MARIST.EDU
Onderwerp: Re: [ADSM-L] Moving to TSM Capacity based licensing from PVU -
experiences
Hi,
We are in the midst of discussions on moving to capacity-based licensing from
the standard PVU-based method for our site. We have a large number of clients (
licensed via TSM-EE, TDP agents
Hi,
We are in the midst of discussions on moving to capacity-based licensing from
the standard PVU-based method for our site. We have a large number of clients (
licensed via TSM-EE, TDP agents, and on client-device basis ) and around 1PB of
primary pool data. As I understand it, there is no pu
17 matches
Mail list logo
