Re: Macintosh 5.2 client

2003-07-17 Thread Andrew Raibeck
al <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Macintosh 5.2 client We have a large installed base of Mac systems here and we are unable to use the Tivoli OSX client because it still requires that the users be logged in in order to receive a scheduled backup. This completely defeats the security features i

Re: Macintosh 5.2 client

2003-07-09 Thread Jim Neal
We have a large installed base of Mac systems here and we are unable to use the Tivoli OSX client because it still requires that the users be logged in in order to receive a scheduled backup. This completely defeats the security features incorporated into the OSX product. I have submitted a reque

Re: Macintosh 5.2 client

2003-07-09 Thread Gretchen L. Thiele
The scheduler and scheduler daemon work fine. But my caveat is that I haven't tried to run it as 'root', only from a logged on (and left on) user. Ideally, I'd like it to run as the Windows scheduler does, backing up even if no one is logged on. This may be implemented, but I haven't found it or fi

Re: Macintosh 5.2 client

2003-07-09 Thread Fred Johanson
Gretchen, How's the scheduler working??? That's something my MAC guys have been complaining about for a long time. At 01:50 PM 7/9/2003 -0400, you wrote: Well, on the whole, I'm happier with this client than I have been in a long time. There is unicode support, so make sure that you have 'autofsr

Macintosh 5.2 client

2003-07-09 Thread Gretchen L. Thiele
Well, on the whole, I'm happier with this client than I have been in a long time. There is unicode support, so make sure that you have 'autofsrename yes' in the client files or just update the node on the server. A couple of oddities, though. 1) There isn't an exclude.dir for the OS X System folde