lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 11:26 AM
Subject: Re: Idea for a TSM feature
> > -Original Message-
> > From: James Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:51 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subj
any support from Tivoli for this
requirement unless I am missing something.
-Original Message-
From: James Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 11:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Idea for a TSM feature
Thought I would throw an idea I had for a TSM
Right now, AFAIK, there's no way to influence how Tivoli makes decisions
about which files to remove from the migrated file cache -- I think adding
ways to influence those decisions would probably be better than to add a
'special' disk storage pool type.
The ability to say "Okay, if there's a sho
> -Original Message-
> From: James Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Idea for a TSM feature
...
> This would not break anything with TSM. It is really simple
> to get in a state
Cascanette [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 9:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Idea for a TSM feature
However what would happen if you were on a DR and you needed to perform a
Point in Time restore. Keeping only the active files would not necessary be
the
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: George Lesho/Partners/AFC)
Fax to:
Subject: Re: Idea for a TSM feature
With current/future tape technology the most important thing for
performance
is to be able to stream data to and from the
>The feature that I would like to see is the ability to create a special disk
> storage pool, that would only migrate inactive versions of backup objects to
> the next storage pool. This would keep all the active versions on disk
> storage.
>
> I'm sure everyone has certain nodes(systems) that ar
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: George Lesho/Partners/AFC)
Fax to:
Subject: Re: Idea for a TSM feature
With current/future tape technology the most important thing for
performance
is to be able to stream data to and from the
, February 27, 2002 9:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Idea for a TSM feature
Yes, but one thing to keep in mind is that most people would also want to
keep the "Last Version" also, even if it is inactive. The reason is that if
someone deletes a file, the next day it would b
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Idea for a TSM feature
>So you are saying to separate the active/inactive versions from the =
tapes?
That would be the net effect for files that were sent to this special =
disk
storage pool
As long as it is a onesy/twosy type operation, going to tape does not incur
a large performance penalty, so restores of the 'Last Version' would not in
my opinion, as it relates to this feature, be that critical.
This feature would be more geared toward operations that typically require a
lot of
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Idea for a TSM feature
>So you are saying to separate the active/inactive versions from the tapes?
That would be the net effect for files that were sent to this special disk
storage pool. Only inactive versions would be on the next storage pools.
However t
"move data node=xxx
type=active" command...
>-Original Message-
>From: James Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 11:44 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Idea for a TSM feature
>
>
>Thought I would throw an idea I had fo
al
Storage Administrator
Freightliner, LLC
(503) 745-6850 phone/vmail
-Original Message-
From: Doug Thorneycroft [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 9:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Idea for a TSM feature
Yes,
I posed a similar question a month or so ago,
My i
-
From: James Thompson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 8:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Idea for a TSM feature
Thought I would throw an idea I had for a TSM feature out on the listserv
and get some thoughts no whether this would be useful or not
"move data node=xxx
type=active" command...
> -Original Message-
> From: James Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 11:44 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Idea for a TSM feature
>
>
> Thought I would throw an idea I had for a TSM fe
>So you are saying to separate the active/inactive versions from the tapes?
That would be the net effect for files that were sent to this special disk
storage pool. Only inactive versions would be on the next storage pools.
However tape backup storage pools would still have both active/inactiv
So you are saying to separate the active/inactive versions from the tapes?
-Original Message-
From: James Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 11:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Idea for a TSM feature
Thought I would throw an idea I had for a TSM
Thought I would throw an idea I had for a TSM feature out on the listserv
and get some thoughts no whether this would be useful or not.
The feature that I would like to see is the ability to create a special disk
storage pool, that would only migrate inactive versions of backup objects to
the nex
19 matches
Mail list logo
