To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Etherchannel and EBU backups.
I've had some feedback re my attached note explaining that whilst it
will
work, all four sessions would operate through a single interface on
the
client and a single interface a
The max
backup I see is 30MB/s. When a gig card can do max 125MB/s.
-Original Message-
From: Thiha Than [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 12:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Etherchannel and EBU backups.
hi Eric,
I am not sure whether it's feasi
hi Eric,
I am not sure whether it's feasible or not because I don't know how
etherchannel works. Is data going to go through four etherchannels
because you start four sessions? If so, your implementation might work.
Make sure not to start more sessions than your max mount point for your
node on
On 24 Sep 2001, at 15:46, Zlatko Krastev/ACIT wrote:
> Eric,
>
> if you set-up an EtherChannel on both sides (!) it is like connecting
> through 400 Mb/s interface (virtual one which distributes load on real ones
> - ent0, ent1, ...). This is done at interface (OSI Level 2) and has to be
> transpa
TED]> on 23.09.2001 08:03:51
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Etherchannel and EBU backups.
I've had some feedback re my attached note explaining that whilst it will
work, all four sessions would opera
I've had some feedback re my attached note explaining that whilst it will
work, all four sessions would operate through a single interface on the
client and a single interface at the TSM server end, not improving my
throughput a jot.
Forgetting Etherchannel for a moment, is there any way that an
I'm interested in determining if etherchannel and EBU/TDP for Oracle, might
be effective in reducing backup times.
Client system: AIX 4.3.3, uses Oracle 7 and backs up using EBU via TDP for
Oracle 2.1
Server system: AIX 4.3.3 and TSM Server 3.7
Network interfaces today are 100 MB ethernet, a sin
