Re: Deployment Engine Failed to initialize

2012-02-29 Thread Allen S. Rout
On 02/28/2012 03:55 PM, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote: I keep wondering if this is FACT or RECOMMENDATION. Based on this document: https://www-304.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21053218 it says you can not use the 6.3 CLIENT with a 5.5 SERVER. I documented this and some user didn't

Re: Deployment Engine Failed to initialize

2012-02-29 Thread Keith Arbogast
Referring to, "Anyone try a 5.x client with a 6.3 server?" It is my understanding that the V6.3 server code was not designed for compatibility with V5 clients, and that TSM Support will limit its problem solving help to "best effort". To discover the degree of incompatibility, we downgraded a V

Re: Deployment Engine Failed to initialize

2012-02-28 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
you reply with your password, social security number or confidential personal information. For more details visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html From: "Stackwick, Stephen" To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Date: 02/28/2012 03:28 PM Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Deployment Engine

Re: Deployment Engine Failed to initialize

2012-02-28 Thread Ray Carlson
al > security number or confidential personal information. For more details > visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html > > > > From: "Stackwick, Stephen" > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Date: 02/28/2012 03:28 PM > Subject:Re: [ADSM-L] Deployment Engine

Re: Deployment Engine Failed to initialize

2012-02-28 Thread Stackwick, Stephen
DSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Deployment Engine Failed to initialize Would people recommend going with 6.2.3 or 6.3 ? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Colwell, William F. Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 10:22 AM To: A

Re: Deployment Engine Failed to initialize

2012-02-28 Thread Colwell, William F.
c81261 and flash 1580639. Thanks, Bill Colwell Draper Lab -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 9:39 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Deployment Engine Failed to

Re: Deployment Engine Failed to initialize

2012-02-28 Thread Sheridan, Peter T.
c81261 and flash 1580639. Thanks, Bill Colwell Draper Lab -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 9:39 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Deployment Engine Failed to

Re: Deployment Engine Failed to initialize

2012-02-28 Thread Billaudeau, Pierre
27;origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU Envoyé : 28 février 2012 09:39 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : Re: [ADSM-L] Deployment Engine Failed to initialize WOW - such harsh words about 6.1 ! I don't agree..my main produc

Re: Deployment Engine Failed to initialize

2012-02-28 Thread George Huebschman
Thanks to all for your help! On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Keith Arbogast wrote: > George, > A concrete reason not to install 6.1 is that, according to Technote > 1452146, "Databases that were formatted by a V6.1 server have DB2 9.5 > tablespaces. Upgrading a V6.1 server to V6.2 does not conve

Re: Deployment Engine Failed to initialize

2012-02-28 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
U Date: 02/28/2012 05:57 AM Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Deployment Engine Failed to initialize Sent by:"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" What Remco said. Nothing Good will Happen on 6.1. I finally got a production system stable on 6.1.3 by disabling reorgs, but that was Windows. I would

Re: Deployment Engine Failed to initialize

2012-02-28 Thread Keith Arbogast
George, A concrete reason not to install 6.1 is that, according to Technote 1452146, "Databases that were formatted by a V6.1 server have DB2 9.5 tablespaces. Upgrading a V6.1 server to V6.2 does not convert the tablespaces. DB2 9.5 has limited capacity for releasing space to the operating syste

Re: Deployment Engine Failed to initialize

2012-02-27 Thread Prather, Wanda
Remco Post Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 5:10 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Deployment Engine Failed to initialize Hi, do not use TSM server 6.1, not even if you have no other options. 6.1 does not even begin to approach alpha quality software. IBM should never have shippe

Re: Deployment Engine Failed to initialize

2012-02-27 Thread George Huebschman
ach alpha quality software. IBM should never have > shipped it. I can't think of a single good reason to install 6.1. Go with > 6.2.3 or newer or 6.3 something. > > > > On 27 feb. 2012, at 22:57, George Huebschman wrote: > > > We are getting the "Deployment Engine Fa

Re: Deployment Engine Failed to initialize

2012-02-27 Thread Remco Post
22:57, George Huebschman wrote: > We are getting the "Deployment Engine Failed to Initialize" when running > ./install.bin for TSM Server 6.1 on a clean new RHEL server. > I see lots of noise out here about this error, in and out of the TSM world. > > (We have another TSM install

Deployment Engine Failed to initialize

2012-02-27 Thread George Huebschman
We are getting the "Deployment Engine Failed to Initialize" when running ./install.bin for TSM Server 6.1 on a clean new RHEL server. I see lots of noise out here about this error, in and out of the TSM world. (We have another TSM installation of TSM 6.3 on a VM that isn't even Q