ays you're the windshield" - ??
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark D.
Rodriguez
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 1:27 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Database backup tapes taking over
Dennis,
I think that what yo
Dennis,
I think that what you need to do s setup DRM correctly. You are doing
what is considered best practice by keeping DBB backups on site and
sending DBS backups off site. However by default all of DRM is set up
to use/manage DBB and not DBS type backups of the database. Therefore
you must
DRM has its own, strict discipline for managing DBbackup tapes. Once
fully implemented, according to product documentation, you should not
interfere with it via Delete Volhistory or other non-DRM commands.
The List archives contain past postings where partial implementations
and meddling have resu
Wednesday, November 09, 2005 9:55 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Database backup tapes taking over
OK...but I was under the impression that you could not set a DB backup expire
in DRM AND run a 'delete volhist type=dbb'. Just
trying to help, but if I'm wrong, I stand c
half Of
William Boyer
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 6:55 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Database backup tapes taking over
According to his original email, the DBBackup tapes stay ONSITE. For the
DBBackup tapes to be expired via DRM and expiration they
need to be OFFSITE. He
liam Boyer
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 6:55 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Database backup tapes taking over
According to his original email, the DBBackup tapes stay ONSITE. For the
DBBackup tapes to be expired via DRM and expiration they
need to be OFFSITE. He'll
27;re the windshield" - ??
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bell,
Charles (Chip)
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 12:19 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Database backup tapes taking over
In DRM, you need to set a value for &#x
back.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dennis Melburn W IT743
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 10:30 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Database backup tapes taking over
I have noticed that ever since I started using the DRM, al
Dennis,
What is your volume reuse delay for the copy storage pool?
I can understand the number to rise from 14 to 28 if you have reuse delay of 14.
In that case, the older tapes that you see are actually in the state of Pending.
Regards,
Sandra
Dennis Melburn W IT743 wrote:
> I have noticed that
ovember 08, 2005 10:30 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Database backup tapes taking over
I have noticed that ever since I started using the DRM, alot of my TSM
servers have been steadily decreasing in scratch tapes by alot. My
servers are scheduled to run a Full Database backup once per day
I have noticed that ever since I started using the DRM, alot of my TSM
servers have been steadily decreasing in scratch tapes by alot. My
servers are scheduled to run a Full Database backup once per day, with a
a Database Snapshot once per week. The full database copies stay on
site, while the sn
11 matches
Mail list logo
