Re: Database Specs

2002-01-25 Thread Malbrough, Demetrius
, January 25, 2002 1:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Database Specs I agree, and I will do that... and thanks for the info... but why does my performance and tuning manual say not to span more than 12 volumes? -Original Message- From: William F. Colwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Database Specs

2002-01-25 Thread Wholey, Joseph (TGA\\MLOL)
: Database Specs Joe - the number of volumes isn't the problem. You need to increase the bufpoolsize in the server dsm.opt file. Here is a 'q db f=d' from my system. The bufpoolsize parameter becomes the 'buffer pool pages' value in the q db

Re: Database Specs

2002-01-25 Thread Wholey, Joseph (TGA\\MLOL)
Thanks... -Original Message- From: Malbrough, Demetrius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 2:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Database Specs If you are going to increase the BUFPoolsize parameter make sure you do it based on the amount of System Memory

Re: Database Specs

2002-01-25 Thread Malbrough, Demetrius
(Use the RESET BUFP command to reset the cache hit statistics.)' Regards, Demetrius Malbrough UNIX/TSM Administrator -Original Message- From: William F. Colwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 1:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Database Specs

Re: Database Specs

2002-01-25 Thread William F. Colwell
Joe - the number of volumes isn't the problem. You need to increase the bufpoolsize in the server dsm.opt file. Here is a 'q db f=d' from my system. The bufpoolsize parameter becomes the 'buffer pool pages' value in the q db. Bill Colwell - - - tsm: NEW_ADSM_SERVER_ON_PORT_1600>q db f=d

Database Specs

2002-01-25 Thread Wholey, Joseph (TGA\\MLOL)
I'm running TSM v 4.1.3 on System\390. My database is 47G and spread across 25 physical volumes (gets a 78% cache hit / not so great). One of my performance and tuning books recommends not spreading your database over more than 12 physical volumes. Could anyone explain why? What kind of per