We have a DIRMC management class for directory information. The destination
is of type DISK. Backup stg can take up to 10 hours to transfer 500 MB to
tape. We have tried different storage for the diskpool but the bottleneck
seems to be elsewhere. It seems to hang for long periods of time doing
n' measured this.
At least I could not not see
So it works much better with the file-volumes in the end , but the dirmc itself
needs to point to the diskdirs-pool
to handle a lot of sessions for lots of simultanous incoming data.
The reason using the DATAFormat=nonblock format was because
Hi Rainer,
We had to use DIRMC, even though I've heard the same that it is no
longer needed. Some of the servers I backup are so large that without DIRMC,
the restores would take a substantial time to complete, I've also had an issue
were the GUI had stopped working, and enab
Hello All,
we are currently using tsm V5 Server and soon will be moving to
TSM V6, starting again from scratch with a brandnew ts3500 library
and the new 3592-c drives.
The new TSM-Server Setups are to be reviewed and now I have some quuestions
on the DIRMC feature which we distribute so far
@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: stor...@us.ibm.com
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page:
http://www.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/Overview/Software/Tivoli/Tivoli_Storage_Manager
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 2012-11-28
01:05:42:
> From: Robert Ouzen
> To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.
November 27, 2012 6:36 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Strange dirmc
Robert,
Have you checked the dsmerror.log in case there is some message there that
hints why the wrong management class is used for directories?
Can you reproduce this with the command line client? Create a
/Overview/Software/Tivoli/Tivoli_Storage_Manager
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 2012-11-27
10:28:08:
> From: Robert Ouzen
> To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu,
> Date: 2012-11-27 10:54
> Subject: Re: Strange dirmc
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>
>
Robert,
Do you have more than one SERVERNAME stanza in dsm.sys? Are you sure that
the DIRMC option is in the correct stanza? Is it possible that DIRMC is
being overridden by a client option set?
Try this test, to see what DIRMC value is in effect. From the command line,
issue this command
Hi Andy
Thank you for your fast reply ...
As you see the dirmc is point to the correct management mglaw
q option dirmc
DIRMC: MGLAW
I have only one stanza in this client
SErvernamelawsrv
COMMmethod TCPip
TCPPort1500
TCPServeraddress
Hi to all
I have a nodename who backup the directory to another management class in my
case mgeducation
I have on my inclexcl file this statement: include /export/home/*mglaw
I tried in the dsm.sys to put dirmc mglaw but still the directory is written to
mgeducation (the data is written
jmc
Thankyou
Bill
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Costa,
Justino
Sent: 19 October 2009 10:58
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] DIRMC
Query OCCupancy STGpool=DIRTAPEPOOL
Or
select distinct NODE_NAME from
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] DIRMC
Hi,
How can I find out which nodes are using DIRMC easily, I have a DIRMC
primary tape pool DIRTAPEPOOL ?
Thanks
Bill
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Andrew Raibeck
Sent: 15 Oc
Hi,
How can I find out which nodes are using DIRMC easily, I have a DIRMC primary
tape pool DIRTAPEPOOL ?
Thanks
Bill
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Andrew
Raibeck
Sent: 15 October 2009 11:22
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
are managed via
reclamation. Storing the directories on disk will likely benefit most those
who do not collocate at all. If you back up solely to disk, then DIRMC is
probably not of significant value. As with anything else, your mileage may
vary.
Pop quiz: "TSM is designed to always restore directo
Grigori,
No I don't have any information about IBM plans for DIRMC?
Bill
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Grigori Solonovitch
Sent: 15 October 2009 10:20
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] DIRMC
Yes, I am stil
Yes, I am still use DIRMC to prevent holding directories in management class
with the biggest expiry period in domain. Do you have any information about IBM
plans for DIRMC?
Grigori G. Solonovitch
Senior Technical Architect
Information Technology Bank of Kuwait and Middle East http
Hi All,
Is DIRMC still useful ? Or should I ditch it.
Windows clients only.
Storage Management Server for Windows - Version 5, Release 4, Level 2.0
Many Thanks
Bill Dourado
Hi,
Remember to have the same Ver Exist. Ver Deleted, Retention Exist and Retention
Only as the highest MGMT Class you have.
I have see some installations where DIRMC only have
VerE = 2
VerD=1
RetO=30
RetE=60.
When you do a point-in-time restore via GUI then has the directory been expired
Should work! This is what TSM refers to as rebinding. Be sure to mark the
override client settings in the cloptset option.
Regards,
Nicholas
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 07/08/2009
01:46:01 PM:
> [image removed]
>
> [ADSM-L] Dirmc and cloptset questions
>
g the dirmc option to any cloptsets and then define as
apppropriate for all clients.
I have such a set defined for solaris clients to exclude /etc/mnttab, and one
for win2k clients with specific excludes.
Anything wrong with this idea; and how best to implement.
Suggestions and criticisms welcome.
Hello,
Some information I've got from TSM support that can be good to know about
DIRMC don't need to be configured to back up directories to a (separate)
disk storage pool
DIRMC specifies the management class (MC) for directories to bind to.
If not specified, by default, the MC cl
Hi,
DIRMC option could help you a lot depend on how you configure it.
Make sure you configure DIRMC to save it's data on Disk only.
Best Regards
Christian Svensson
Cell: +46-70-325 1577
E-mail: christian.svens...@cristie.se
Skype: cristie.christian.sve
Hello,
How could DIRMC option on server side improve the restore time.Any idea?
--
Best Regards
Ashish Sharma
ST Microelectronics Ltd.
919717003853
only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 01/26/2007
09:32:03 AM:
> I ran a test backing up a directory structure with files and
> subdirectories to a reto=
Denis -
The experimental results which you report certainly disagree with the
published descriptions of how the GUI should behave in the absence of
path directories. Technote 1157531 in particular is at odds with
what you found. I recommend at least filling in the Comments box at
the bottom of
I ran a test backing up a directory structure with files and
subdirectories to a reto=20 management class for the files and
directories via DIRMC to a reto=0 management class. After the backup I
deleted the data and re-ran the incremental backup to expire the objects
from TSM. I confirmed the
l directory objects to speed restore.
Orville,
This was discussed at the Oxford TSM Symposium last Fall, as Remco pointed
out. Here is one issue that you need to be aware of when not using DIRMC.
This is a trap that is easy to fall into.
On Windows and Netware, the metadata for directory informat
On Jul 22, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Orville Lantto wrote:
Thank you Richard, but my primary concern is that contradictory
advice was published by IBM within a month. It is hard enough for
us veterans, who started long ago with ADSM, to design efficient
solutions for our customers. Having conflicting
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] To DirMC, or not to DirMC
Orville -
Indeed, individual Technotes usually portray a small part of the big
painting, and by the nature of their modest intention do not give a
sense of the whole.
Few customers use DIRMc, and depend upon the default
Orville -
Indeed, individual Technotes usually portray a small part of the big
painting, and by the nature of their modest intention do not give a
sense of the whole.
Few customers use DIRMc, and depend upon the default behavior of
storing directories with the longest management class Retonly
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 01:10:19AM +0200, Remco Post wrote:
> This was discussed at Oxford last year. I don't recall the outcome. I do
> recall that because TSM allocates 256k chunks minimum for a transaction,
> you do not really want to use this feature since TSM v5.3.
Isn't this only for sequen
Windows and Novell directory objects to speed
> restore.
>
> TechNote 1240913 "DIRMC has little effect on restore performance"
> makes the case that DIRMC is obsolete and unnecessary.
>
> These two TechNotes are both dated within the last month.
>
> Anybody fr
ed restore.
TechNote 1240913 "DIRMC has little effect on restore performance" makes the
case that DIRMC is obsolete and unnecessary.
These two TechNotes are both dated within the last month.
Anybody from IBM want to clear this up?
Orville L. Lantto
Glasshouse Technologies, Inc.
nice activity from you, Andy!
>
> 1) I use DIRMC in my environment ...
>
>a) to ensure that GUI restores will accurately show files
> available for restore (NO)
>
>b) to ensure that directory backups do not go directly to
> tape (NO )
>
>
TSM handling of directory backups, either by default behavior
or with the use of the DIRMC option, has often been a source
of confusion for customers. We in TSM development would like
to better understand how and why our customers use DIRMC. To
that end, we are interested in your answers to the
n policy for directories and have a
> DIRMC entry in the dsm.opt file to bind the dirs to this
> management class.
> There is one top-level directory and it's contents which is
> bound to a separate management class that will retain data for
> 7 years (I use an 'INCLUDE' in the
Hi All,
I have a node which has all data bar 1 top-level directory and its
contents bound to the default management class (2 year retention). I
have a separate management class set up with a slightly longer retention
policy for directories and have a DIRMC entry in the dsm.opt file to
bind the
ot be rebound
> to the new MC.
>
> Ben
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Becky Davidson
> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 10:35 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: dirmc and rebinding
>
> We
24, 2005 10:35 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: dirmc and rebinding
We are about to implement the dirmc option. The first time that it runs
will it rebind all directories to the new mc both active and inactive?
I have done some reading and nothing I have found says that it won't but
I want
We are about to implement the dirmc option. The first time that it runs
will it rebind all directories to the new mc both active and inactive?
I have done some reading and nothing I have found says that it won't but
I wanted to check.
Thanks
Becky Davidson
Sr Network Sys Admin
Graybar
Yes it still works that way when you don't specify a DIRMC.
Kyle
fred johanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone know if TSM still puts directories in the mgmtc with the
longest retention period? On one of my machines, that belongs to a special
group of machines with all sorts
Does anyone know if TSM still puts directories in the mgmtc with the
longest retention period? On one of my machines, that belongs to a special
group of machines with all sorts of special handling. I've used DIRMC to
ensure the directory of some desktop doesn't get treated in the same
Restore Order processing did definitely fix one problem. DIRMC still
solves other problems if you are storing data on tape.
We used to tell our users that backups were stored on disk from the
previous night's backups so if they did restores during the day then
there would be no tape mounts
separate pool so
that you can keep that data on disk might help. This is one reason why we have
not yet stopped using the DIRMC. With that being said more and more of my
customers are implementing file device classes or VTL's which keep most of the
primary data on disk. As a result I no longe
Paul,
It is definitely, absolutely, positively, seen it myself - fixed Been
fixed for years. Forget DIRMC.
Ken
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Paul Fielding
> Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 16:06
double-tape-mount theory, and though I understand it is
supposedly fixed, I haven't heard anyone say "I have seen it, I know it
works, you no longer need to keep a dirmc diskpool".
Of course, if it is indeed working as designed now, it doesn't resolve the
other dirmc issues currentl
e restored. Net result
-
tapes might get mounted twice.
Is my understanding incorrect? (could well be). If this behavior has
indeed
been fixed so that directories are restored as they are hit on the tape
(with a pre-created non-ACLed directory being created first) then it
would
indeed make sense th
tapes might get mounted twice.
Is my understanding incorrect? (could well be). If this behavior has indeed
been fixed so that directories are restored as they are hit on the tape
(with a pre-created non-ACLed directory being created first) then it would
indeed make sense that a DIRMC pool is no l
If V5.3 in fact only writes in larger blocks in the smaller directories may
take up more space that required.
Still, that issue aside you should no longer need to have a DIRMC pool. At one
time there was a feature (or call it a bug) where every directory had to be
restored as it came up which
Storage pools consist of one or more volumes, generally disk or tape.
The storage pool gets its volumes via the device class which has a
maxscr setting to limit the volume count and max capacity to estimate or
assign the max size of the volume. The device class also points to a
directory which in t
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Steve Bennett might have said:
> Wanda,
>
> I just added a sata disk array in TSM v5.2 so I'll jump in here.
>
> If you are using one disk partition in Windows for the device class then
> you can let TSM define the number of vols it needs up to maxscr or out
> of disk conditio
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 07:38:16AM -0500, Richard Sims wrote:
> blocks of 256 KiB minimum...". Could you provide a documentation or web
> site reference for that 5.3 change?
No, sorry. Just the info I received through the PMR. I made the suggestion
to include this in e.g. a README, and that sugge
n but this is not the case (at least on windows, on 5.2.2.4
- discussed on the list).
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Steve Bennett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 10:09 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: DIRMC - Are copypool reclamation performance issues
r
Tim/Steve
Thanks - got it!
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rushforth, Tim
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 11:17 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: DIRMC - Are copypool reclamation performance issues
resolved or not.
1. You
ED]
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 9:49 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: DIRMC - Are copypool reclamation performance issues
resolved or not.
Tim:
We are looking at using all disk now for our onsite disk pool with our
next capital$ buy.
Something I've never been sure of -
Whenf you u
it somehow?
Thanks
Wanda
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rushforth, Tim
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 5:31 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: DIRMC - Are copypool reclamation performance issues
resolved or not.
It is fixed
2) Do reclaims happen by themselves, or do you have to force it somehow?
Thanks
Wanda
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rushforth, Tim
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 5:31 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: DIRMC - Are copypool reclam
for some time.
I'd like to see definitive information on this before committing my 5.3
beliefs.
thanks, Richard Sims
On Mar 17, 2005, at 2:29 AM, Jurjen Oskam wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 07:29:50PM -0600, Rushforth, Tim wrote:
[DIRMC]
What in 5.3 warrants new consideration?
Probably t
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 07:29:50PM -0600, Rushforth, Tim wrote:
[DIRMC]
> What in 5.3 warrants new consideration?
Probably the fact that sequential volumes are written to in blocks of at
least 256 KB, even when the data is only 1500 bytes. This can cause a lot of
overhead, and
- Original Message -
in a much faster backup. Now all that being said this new feature in V5.3
warrents new consideration. My new consideration is to stop using DIRMC
pools as the reason they were created in the first place has also long been
fixed.
Which reason is this that has been
What in 5.3 warrants new consideration?
The reason we implemented DIRMC is so that when a user restores a file(s) there
are not extra tape mounts to restore the directories We ran into this on
multiple occasions, even when all files were on disk, tape mounts would occur
because the
It is fixed but the reason there have been suggestions to use a file type
device class is because disk pools unline sequential pools are scanned from
begining to end for every storage pool backup. I have had some customers that
have millions of directories in their DIRMC pool. Even when none
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 2:31 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: DIRMC - Are copypool reclamation performance issues
resolved or not.
It is fixed (somewhere around 5.1.5.2).
-Original Message-
From: Thorneycroft, Doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005
It is fixed (somewhere around 5.1.5.2).
-Original Message-
From: Thorneycroft, Doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 4:25 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: DIRMC - Are copypool reclamation performance issues resolved or
not.
OK, after spending a large portion
OK, after spending a large portion of my day reviewing adsm-l post going back to
2000, I'm still not sure. Does anyone know if there is still a performance
problem
running reclamation on a DIRMC random access disk pool?
I came across one post that said it was supposedly fixed, but recomm
On Jan 21, 2005, at 9:47 AM, Lepre, James wrote:
Jim, I don't know what goes on with my posts, but for some reason,
wherever I wrote an equal (=) sign, something somewhere tacked "3D"
(the
ASCII hex code for '=') after it. ...
Though mail is two-dimensional, you may sometimes see the "3D". :-)
Tha
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Andrew Raibeck
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 2:34 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: dirmc question
Jim, I don't know what goes on with my posts, but for some reason,
wherever I wrote an
gt; Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
> > > The command line is your friend.
> > > "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
> > >
> > > "ADSM: Dist Stor
ernet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
> > The command line is your friend.
> > "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
> >
> > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 01/20/2005
> >
er
clicks on a folder to get to a file in it is the folder updated such
that a new version is backed up?
I'm looking for a reason a GUI PIT restore wouldn't display a folder and
it's contents that were obviously there. I'm using DIRMC and have extra
versions and ver del set to one
er updated such
> that a new version is backed up?
>
> I'm looking for a reason a GUI PIT restore wouldn't display a folder and
> it's contents that were obviously there. I'm using DIRMC and have extra
> versions and ver del set to one plus the values in the files
here. I'm using DIRMC and have extra
versions and ver del set to one plus the values in the files MC, but if
a folder gets backed up everytime it's touched then there probably
aren't enough versions data exists.
thanks,
Jim
ols.
I asked this here, because IBM support asked why we were using FILE
volumes instead of DISK volumes for our DIRMC stgpool. He recommends
DISK volumes, but only mentioned performance as a reason for this
recommendation. I answered that we were using FILE volumes for better
handling of a database
se restoral situation.
Yes. This is also documented in the 5.2/5.3 ADMIN guide describing
difference between DISK and FILE pools.
>Would it be a good idea to return to a large DIRPOOL of type
>DISK and eliminate DIRFILE, on TSM 5.3 and AIX 5.2?
See above!
>>Storage pools that act a
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 02:02:08PM -0600, Stapleton, Mark wrote:
> Storage pools that act as DIRMC management class destinations [...]
> contain redundant data; the normal client data destination pool also
> contains a copy of all directory and file structure data.
I wasn't awa
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jurjen Oskam
>I have a question about which devclass to use for a
>storagepool that is exclusively used as DIRMC destination.
>
>The server originally was set up with a large enough DIRPOOL
>of type DISK. Lat
Hi there,
I have a question about which devclass to use for a storagepool
that is exclusively used as DIRMC destination.
The server originally was set up with a large enough DIRPOOL
of type DISK. Later, DIRPOOL was reduced in size, and a DIRFILE
stgpool was added that consists of FILE volumes
Yes, but if you'll read my first reply, you want to leave the dirmc pool
in place. It enables *much* faster restores when you have to bring back
a lot of files (like an entire drive).
--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Berbee Information Networks
Office 262.521.5627
>-Original
Hi Mark
Correct me if I am wrong you said that the information is also stored in my standard
disk stotage pool (after migration on tape too). So after a move nodedata on my new
storage pool on disk I will not need anymore the dirmc parameter and the old dirmc
storage disk , all the information
I know backup my dirmc on disk , I
>think to do a move nodedata from my cartridge storage to my
>new storage disk but what about my storage disk of dirmc I
>think I will not need anymore .
>
>Did I need to do :
> 1. A next storage from my actual dirmc storage disk to the
&
Hello
I am running Netware backups at night on disk and during the day I migrate it to
cartridge I am planning now to backups those Novell 's client just on a storage disk.
For better performance I know backup my dirmc on disk , I think to do a move nodedata
from my cartridge storage
Yes, setup two nodes for the box and set different DIRMC settings in
separate dsm.opt files.
If you do not want to deal with two nodes, the answer would be "no".
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Marc Lowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EM
Maybe, but in list archives definitely. Look at Tab Trepagnier's answer
from 16.12.2002 on the thread "Setting up DIRMC seq pool on disk" (you can
learn from other Tab's experiments alot).
Now in recent versions IBM claims that have fixed copypool reclamation
reading from p
ents. All DIRMC management classes are set for unlimited versions.
Since I implemented that configuration in April, my system has sent
approximately 1.1 million directories to that pool totalling about 1.25
GB.
I've set my directory pool to migrate to tape at 99% full and continue
until empt
Hi
I'm looking at setting up the famous DIRMC trick, with a primary sequential
pool on disk. I have a couple of questions:
1) Is it a requirement to have the recommended setup
DIRPOOL primary DISK: NEXTPOOL->DIRFILE
DIRFILE primary SEQUENTIAL on DISK
or can we have our DIRMC point
Ooops, I mis-spoke... It's the output from "Q OCC " (from dsmadmc
prompt) that would confirm whether you are storing data into the DIRMC
storage pool.
Don France
Technical Architect -- Tivoli Certified Consultant
Tivoli Storage Manager, WinNT/2K, AIX/Unix, OS/390
San Jose, Ca
sent to DIRMC storage
pool)??? I don't recall for sure, but I thought the ACL's for Netware were
not that large, so might (mostly) not exceed the space reserved for that
info in the TSM db.
Regards,
Don
Don France
Technical Architect -- Tivoli Certified Consultant
Tivoli Storage Mana
TED]
cc:
Subject:Question about dirmc
Hi to all
I implant a dirmc management class for the directories of my Netware
clients
on disk. My question is did the next incremental backup will rebound all
the
directories to new management class or I need to do a full backup ???
T.I.A Reg
Hi to all
I implant a dirmc management class for the directories of my Netware clients
on disk. My question is did the next incremental backup will rebound all the
directories to new management class or I need to do a full backup ???
T.I.A Regards
Ouzen Robert
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
>
>
> Does anyone know at what ADSM or TSM level DIRMC was added?
>
It's in
ADSTAR(TM) Distributed Storage Manager Version 1
User's Guide and Reference for Microsoft® Windows(TM)
Release 2
Third Edition (September 1994)
Document Number SH35-0125-02
---- sni
Bill Boyer wrote:
> Does anyone know at what ADSM or TSM level DIRMC was added?
I don't, but DIRMC was available in Tivoli ADSM 3.1
--
Wayne T. Smith -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- University of Maine System -- UNET
Does anyone know at what ADSM or TSM level DIRMC was added?
We have a potential TSM outsource contract, but the client has LOTS of old
TSM 3.7 and ADSM 3.1.xx versions..I'm talking 100's of 'em. Until we can get
them all rolled over to a supported release, I would like to implemen
Hi Andy,
Thanks, for the excellent responses (below and to Mark's message) ... and
know the community continues to appreciate your participation (here and
elsewhere)!
I am relieved to learn DIRMC is still relevant, and will continue to
advocate its use with customers supporting Win2K, Ne
of which
might ultimately not be pertinent to the issue.
Arnaud has already communicated to me that (a) he can not recreate the
problem reliably, and (b) as he mentioned in his last ADSM-L post on this
subject, he created a new policy domain that does for him what he wants.
So the root cause of his troub
originally reported the problem) will post the information.
As to DIRMC being obsolete... not to the best of my knowledge. I just did
a small test this morning, backing up several files to disk, then looked
at the contents of the volume, and I can clearly see that directory
information is there as
I share Mark's sentiments... on TWO points:
- if this was resolved, for both users in the discussion, let's share the
results;
- if DIRMC is no longer relevant, I'd sure like to know why! Win2K is
becoming ever more prevalent, and most data center customers go wild with
lots of pe
y upto
you to decide.
Anyway on another note, the IBM/Tivoli education material has been
stating for sometime now that the DIRMC attribute is effectively
obsolete. The material states that all directory information is kept in
the DB now. The only reason I used DIRMC in the past was to store my
d
Subject:Re: Directories written in the wrong pool, although using
dirmc option
Hi Andy,
And thanks a lot for your response. I checked dsm.opt on one of the
nodes generating problems, it looks like :
LANG AMENG
tcpport 1500
TCPSERVERADDRESS X
ipxsocket0005
ipxserv
Subject:Re: Directories written in the wrong pool, although using
dirmc option
Andy,
I'm seeing something similar on my system.
I have all my nodes pointing their directories to storage pool
"folderdisk". Most nodes do indeed send their directories there, but a
h
.\SYSTEM32\CONFIG\...\*
SUbdir Yes
passwordaccess generate
TCPWINDOWSIZE 64
BACKUPRegistry YES
ERRORLOGRETENTION 7
SCHEDLOGRETENTION 7
I tried "dsmc show opt" and found the dirmc was pointing to the right
management class. I also made sure this node was properly associated
with option
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
