Re: Client upgrade to 5.2.3.1

2004-11-05 Thread Bill Dourado
DSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 04/11/2004 18:19 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Client upgrade to 5.2.3.1 Bill, OK, next step is to look at the APAR's suggestion to use S

Re: Client upgrade to 5.2.3.1

2004-11-04 Thread Andrew Raibeck
7:26 Elapsed processing time: 00:03:46 > 04-11-2004 05:17:26 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS END > 04-11-2004 05:17:26 --- SCHEDULEREC OBJECT END S2321 04-11-2004 05:00:00 > 04-11-2004 05:17:26 Scheduled event 'S2321' completed successfull > > > Thanks > > Bill >

Re: Client upgrade to 5.2.3.1

2004-11-04 Thread Curtis Stewart
"Andrew, I have now added EXCLUDE.DIR C:\ADSM.SYS to my DSM.OPT. It adsm.sys backup failure is occuring during backup of the system state. This are the last few lines of dsmshed.log :-" Did you stop and start your scheduler? [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Client upgrade to 5.2.3.1

2004-11-04 Thread Bill Dourado
ed event 'S2321' completed successfull Thanks Bill Andrew Raibeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 01/11/2004 16:23 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:

Re: Client upgrade to 5.2.3.1

2004-11-01 Thread Andrew Raibeck
mal File--> 2,326 > > C:\adsm.sys\EVENTLOG\EVENTLOG.xml [Sent] > > 29-10-2004 14:04:25 Normal File--> 828 > > C:\adsm.sys\EVENTLOG\EVENTLOG_tsm.xml [Sent] > > 29-10-2004 14:04:26 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS BEGIN > > 29-10-2004 14:04:26 Total

Re: Client upgrade to 5.2.3.1

2004-11-01 Thread Bill Dourado
er" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 29/10/2004 16:17 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: Client upgrade to 5.2.3.1 Bill, This looks like APAR IC41440 which was introduced in version 5.2.2.9. A fix is not

Re: Client upgrade to 5.2.3.1

2004-10-29 Thread Warren, Matthew (Retail)
: Friday, October 29, 2004 2:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Client upgrade to 5.2.3.1 Hello All, I have just upgraded a client from 5.2.2.0 to 5.2.3.1 as recommended by IBM and this list, to get over a problem. This is part of the log of the first scheduled backup since the upgrade : 29-10-2004

Re: Client upgrade to 5.2.3.1

2004-10-29 Thread Andrew Raibeck
er of objects rebound: 0 > 29-10-2004 14:04:26 Total number of objects deleted: 0 > 29-10-2004 14:04:26 Total number of objects expired: 33 > 29-10-2004 14:04:26 Total number of objects failed: 22,734 > 29-10-2004 14:04:26 Total number of bytes transfer

Re: Client upgrade to 5.2.3.1

2004-10-29 Thread Bill Dourado
29-10-2004 14:04:26 Elapsed processing time: 00:05:53 Thanks Bill "Stapleton, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 29/10/2004 15:03 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EM

Re: Client upgrade to 5.2.3.1

2004-10-29 Thread Stapleton, Mark
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Dourado >I have just upgraded a client from 5.2.2.0 to 5.2.3.1 as >recommended by IBM and this list, to get over a problem. [snip] What does the rest of the dsmsched.log say? (If you have the QUIET option in your dsm.opt

Client upgrade to 5.2.3.1

2004-10-29 Thread Bill Dourado
Hello All, I have just upgraded a client from 5.2.2.0 to 5.2.3.1 as recommended by IBM and this list, to get over a problem. This is part of the log of the first scheduled backup since the upgrade : 29-10-2004 14:04:26 Total number of objects inspected: 22,734 29-10-2004 14:04:26 Total number