Richard - from what I read about that, it seems that it would have no
effect on this. This has nothing to do with the "same" volume usages by
two processes, but just choosing to have one process run before
another.
Hopefully someone from Tivoly/IBM will see and respond.
-Tom
>>> [EMAIL PROTECT
>Is there any way to modify the priority of CHECKIN to be higher than
>CHECKOUT in the background process queue?
Tom - I'm not aware of a means yet available in the product to allow for
selective prioritization. One thing you might try is to use the
NOPREEMPT server option and see if that
I am using a 3494 ATL and ADSM 3.1.2.55. When we remove tapes from ADSM
to the bulk door of the 3494 we issue 90 CHECKOUT commands to ADSM.
These background commands take a little while to complete. We have the
3494 set to give priority to the convienience door vs the bulk door so
that individua
