Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape

2002-02-21 Thread Bill Mansfield
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: OM> Subject: Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager&qu

Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape

2002-02-21 Thread Seay, Paul
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: OM> Subject: Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[E

Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape

2002-02-21 Thread Allen Barth
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: OM> Subject: Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape Sent by:

Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape

2002-02-21 Thread Wu, Jie
for the 3584-L32. I believe this way you will get better performance. Jie -Original Message- From: Daniel Sparrman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape Hi We have a sys

Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape

2002-02-20 Thread Daniel Sparrman
Hi We have a system configured as follows: One P-Series 610 with dual 450 PowerPC processors 1GB RAM 2 18.2GB Ultra3 15K drives which are mirrored and contains AIX system and Tivoli logs 2GB Ultra3 15K drives which are mirrored and contains Tivoli database (30GB large) One IBM FibreChannel card