Corporation
Matt Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/22/2002 01:53 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Audit Library question.
|
| Fax to:
Following the discussion here (and in past months), part of the
problem is the way libraries respond. I believe (Tivoli maybe coluld
chime in and give the fine points on this) that when audit library
checkl=barcode is issued that a certain SCSI command is sent to
library.
With the varied libraries
We too have a 3584. When an AUDIT LIBRARY checklabel=barcode (run daily) occurs, the
arm moves over the entire library of tapes, reading the barcodes. I have witnessed
this. If there is something that was done at installation time, of our LTO, to effect
this, I couldn't say. Maybe someone ou
Murray, Jim [mailto:JMurray@;LIBERTY-BANK.COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Audit Library question.
>
>
> Not so here with an ATL 7100 checklabel=barcode and it Always
> moves up and
> down the rows, can only assume it is reading
At 11:03 AM -0700 10/22/02, KEN HORACEK said:
With checklabel=barcode, all of the barcodes are read. This is then
checked with the internal memory of the library as to what the
library's inventory says is where.
That's not what I'm seeing, and that's not what I think I'm reading
from others her
-Confucius
-Original Message-
From: Todd Lundstedt [mailto:Todd_Lundstedt@;VIA-CHRISTI.ORG]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 14:28
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Audit Library question.
Not true on my library, Ken...
I have run several audits using checklabel=barcode before with success.
T
tsm an audit library checklabel=barcode only checks against the
library manager's data base.
Dwight
-Original Message-
From: KEN HORACEK [mailto:KHORACEK@;INCSYSTEM.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Audit Library question.
Not
|
| cc:
|
| Fax to:
|
| Subj
|
| cc:
|
| Fax to:
|
|
Not true...
With checklabel=barcode, all of the barcodes are read. This is then checked with the
internal memory of the library as to what the library's inventory says is where. The
tape is mounted, only if the barcode is mis-read.
Ken
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/22/2002 1
I imagine the checkl=barocde was introduced to shorten audit, without
it you would have to mount every tape in library - which would take
some considerable time with some libraries! What you are doing is
checkinbg the barcode label in library memory as opposed to checking
the
magnetic tape label h
At 11:29 AM -0400 10/22/02, David Longo said:
With checklabel=barcode, what happens is that TSM reads the internal
memory of the library as to what the library's inventory says is
where.
So checklabel=barcode doesn't really mean read the barcodes? It just
means check the library's internal memo
With checklabel=barcode, what happens is that TSM reads the internal
memory of the library as to what the library's inventory says is
where.
So generally that won't take long. And a drive needs to be available
for
the case where library had a problem reading a barcode label, that
tape
can be mount
At 10:41 AM -0500 10/18/02, Todd Lundstedt said:
How long should the command
"Audit Library LibName CheckLabel=BARCODE"
take to process. I have less than 200 tapes in the library. I have done
this before and it took less than 5 mins. This one has been running for
over 40 minutes now.
Our situ
channel
LTO drives. I am running TSM 5.1.1 on win2k.
--
Thanks,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Todd Lundstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Fri Oct 18 11:41:46 2002
Subject: Audit Library question.
How long sho
16 matches
Mail list logo
