Re: Atape driver 7.0.3.0 auto failover

2002-05-25 Thread Zlatko Krastev
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by:"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Atape driver 7.0.3.0 auto failover The 3590 is a dual ported device. It actually has two fiber port WWPNs. AIX actually is talking to both ports all the

Re: Atape driver 7.0.3.0 auto failover

2002-02-28 Thread Joshua S. Bassi
, 2002 1:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Atape driver 7.0.3.0 auto failover Are the 3584 drives dual ported? -Original Message- From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 2:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Atape driver 7.0.3.0 auto failover I

Re: Atape driver 7.0.3.0 auto failover

2002-02-26 Thread Seay, Paul
o [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 2:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Atape driver 7.0.3.0 auto failover I notice that the Atape driver 7.0.3.0 supports Auto failover for tape devices on 3590 devices only, as I read it. Anybody know when it will be supported on 358

Re: Atape driver 7.0.3.0 auto failover

2002-02-26 Thread David Longo
id Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 2:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Atape driver 7.0.3.0 auto failover I notice that the Atape driver 7.0.3.0 supports Auto failover for tape devices on 3590 devices only, as I read it. Anybody know when it will be supported o

Re: Atape driver 7.0.3.0 auto failover

2002-02-26 Thread Seay, Paul
Are the 3584 drives dual ported? -Original Message- From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 2:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Atape driver 7.0.3.0 auto failover I notice that the Atape driver 7.0.3.0 supports Auto failover for tape devices on

Atape driver 7.0.3.0 auto failover

2002-02-26 Thread David Longo
I notice that the Atape driver 7.0.3.0 supports Auto failover for tape devices on 3590 devices only, as I read it. Anybody know when it will be supported on 3584 library with Fibre Channel? Or is someone using it that way now? David Longo "MMS " made the following annotations on 02/26/02 14: