Re: Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn't be

2013-06-21 Thread Prather, Wanda
lto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Ray Carlson Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 2:17 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn't be Out of curiosity, had the data been DeDuped when it was on the Disk, before it was migrated to tape, and

Re: Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn't be

2013-06-21 Thread Prather, Wanda
Thanks, will give that a try. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Mike De Gasperis Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 12:31 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn'

Re: Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn't be

2013-06-21 Thread Prather, Wanda
> From: "Prather, Wanda" > To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu, > Date: 2013-06-19 11:55 > Subject: Re: Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn't > be Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" > > Richard, > Here is the Q OCC result. > The Q O

Re: Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn't be

2013-06-19 Thread Ray Carlson
> +Storage+Manager/page/Home > > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 2013-06-19 > 11:53:07: > >> From: "Prather, Wanda" >> To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu, >> Date: 2013-06-19 11:55 >> Subject: Re: Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but s

Re: Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn't be

2013-06-19 Thread Mike De Gasperis
See how they compare -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Andrew Raibeck Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 12:20 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn't be Hi Wanda, Iden

Re: Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn't be

2013-06-19 Thread Andrew Raibeck
r, Wanda" > To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu, > Date: 2013-06-19 11:55 > Subject: Re: Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn't be > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" > > Richard, > Here is the Q OCC result. > The Q OCC shows all the data for FSID

Re: Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn't be

2013-06-19 Thread Prather, Wanda
LARX1 -Original Message- From: Prather, Wanda Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 11:03 AM To: Richard Cowen Subject: RE: Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn't be >>Did the MOVE NODEDATA result in a zillion new volumes (.BFS's) ? No, we don't use scratch

Re: Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn't be

2013-06-18 Thread Stackwick, Stephen
: [ADSM-L] Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn't be > > TSM 6.2.3 > Backup done with TSM VE 6.4.0.0 and TSM client 6.4.0.0. > > VMCTLMC points to a dedicated sequential pool on fast disk. That pool has no > NEXTSTGPOOL defined. > > VMMC points backup

Re: Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn't be

2013-06-18 Thread Prather, Wanda
rote on 2013-06-17 21:45:04: > From: "Prather, Wanda" > To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu, > Date: 2013-06-17 21:45 > Subject: Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn't be > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" > > TSM 6.2.3 > Backup done wit

Re: Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn't be

2013-06-18 Thread Andrew Raibeck
rom: "Prather, Wanda" > To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu, > Date: 2013-06-17 21:45 > Subject: Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn't be > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" > > TSM 6.2.3 > Backup done with TSM VE 6.4.0.0 and TSM client 6.4.0.0

Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn't be

2013-06-17 Thread Prather, Wanda
TSM 6.2.3 Backup done with TSM VE 6.4.0.0 and TSM client 6.4.0.0. VMCTLMC points to a dedicated sequential pool on fast disk. That pool has no NEXTSTGPOOL defined. VMMC points backup data to a deduplicated sequential pool on fast disk storage. After the server dedups it there, it migrates to a