Re: A consensus on scheduling methodology

2001-03-20 Thread George Lesho
AIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: George Lesho/Partners/AFC) Fax to: Subject: A consensus on scheduling methodology I have never have been very happy with the scheduler in TSM because it is basically a time dependant process were I prefer an event dependant process. I would li

Re: A consensus on scheduling methodology

2001-03-20 Thread Fred Johanson
Our head of production and I are looking at the use of ESP for scheduling. It's event driven, with dependencies included, contains a built in notification, and has recovery as a basic component. At 10:11 AM 3/20/2001 +1000, you wrote: >I have never have been very happy with the scheduler in TSM

A consensus on scheduling methodology

2001-03-19 Thread PETER GRIFFIN
I have never have been very happy with the scheduler in TSM because it is basically a time dependant process were I prefer an event dependant process. I would like to know what is the generally accepted method to schedule both admin and client processes Comment Please. Peter Griffin