Re: 6 vs 8 (volume labels)

2007-11-28 Thread Kelly Lipp
Inc. 485-B Elkton Drive Colorado Springs, CO 80907 719-266-8777 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Sims Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 1:43 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] 6 vs 8 (volume la

Re: 6 vs 8 (volume labels)

2007-11-28 Thread Richard Sims
On Nov 28, 2007, at 2:22 PM, Nick Laflamme wrote: Oh, this is embarrassing. Could someone, perhaps from ADSM development, explain Technote 1212111, please? It says explicitly that Different generations of media are identified by the trailing 2 barcode characters of an 8-character external

Re: 6 vs 8 (volume labels)

2007-11-28 Thread Nick Laflamme
Wanda Prather wrote: TSM doesn't know anything about the technology level of the media just because you are using the 8 digits. TSM doesn't care, in fact. If it did, it wouldn't be happy sticking an LTO2 cartridge into an LTO3 drive (which is a legitimate thing to do). The LIBRARY uses the last

Re: 6 vs 8 (volume labels)

2007-11-28 Thread Wanda Prather
TSM doesn't know anything about the technology level of the media just because you are using the 8 digits. TSM doesn't care, in fact. If it did, it wouldn't be happy sticking an LTO2 cartridge into an LTO3 drive (which is a legitimate thing to do). The LIBRARY uses the last 2 digits, I think, to

6 vs 8 (volume labels)

2007-11-28 Thread Nick Laflamme
Our TS 3500 tape library can be configured to report volume labels as six digits or eight. We've used six digit identifiers all along, but as I read materials on mixing LTO drive (and tape) levels in the same partition, I suspect we should have gone to eight volume labels all along so TSM has the