Message-
From: Nathan Himmel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 3590 - Estimate Capacity question
Please see IBM Announcement letter #100-047 or
http://www.storage.ibm.com/media/prod_data/g225-6759.pdf
Nathan Himmel
Semech
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: 3590 - Estimate Capacity question
> I think you may be mistaken here. We were one of the customers that had
the
> early E1A drives. In order for the K tapes to be used we had to put a
> feature update
models cannot support this to my knowledge unless a recent change was made.
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Himmel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 3:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 3590 - Estimate Capacity question
3590B1A drive should support (with the
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 10:08 PM
Subject: Re: 3590 - Estimate Capacity question
> 3590B1A drives are 128 track drives. Native capacity should be 10 GB.
> They do not support the K tapes. Upgrade to 3590E1A for that support and
> 256 tra
age-
> From: Nathan Himmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@CORUS
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 9:59 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: 3590 - Estimate Capacity question
>
> <<...OLE_Obj...>>
> 3590B1A drive should support (with the proper microcode) the
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 10:57 PM
Subject: Re: 3590 - Estimate Capacity question
> I'm guessing you are compressing your data on the client side before you
> send it to the server. Otherwise you should be seeing much higher
capacity
> numbe
e? Do I need a second
> device class?
> How could I use the old vols on the new drives? Help
>
> Thanks
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Orville Lantto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
ED]>
11/08/01 05:15 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: 3590 - Estimate Capacity question
Question about upgrading 3590B1a to 3590E1a. Is there any other
documentation/procedure I can review. I'v
The new drives can read the old tapes, they can write the old tapes in the new denser
format, but they CANNOT append to old tapes. So you must either define a new device
class as has already been suggested or at time of conversion, mark all existing tapes
as READONLY to prevent TSM from trying
n
and get recycled. At least that is the way that I read it. So setting up
the device classes correctly is important.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 8:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 3590 - Estimate Capacity que
Lantto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 3590 - Estimate Capacity question
3590B1A drives are 128 track drives. Native capacity should be 10 GB.
They do not support the K tapes. Upgrade to 3590E1A for that support and
256 track
hanks
-Original Message-
From: Orville Lantto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 3590 - Estimate Capacity question
3590B1A drives are 128 track drives. Native capacity should be 10 GB.
They do not support the K tapes. Upgra
I'm guessing you are compressing your data on the client side before you
send it to the server. Otherwise you should be seeing much higher capacity
numbers. It's either that or your drives aren't actually compressing the
data. Yes, the report will indicate how much data actually went on the
tap
3590B1A drives are 128 track drives. Native capacity should be 10 GB.
They do not support the K tapes. Upgrade to 3590E1A for that support and
256 track tapes.
Orville L. Lantto
Datatrend Technologies, Inc.
121 Cheshire Lane #700
Minnetonka, MN 55305
Nathan Himmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent
14 matches
Mail list logo
