bject: Re: 3584 upgrade: 3592-E05 to 3592-E07
I agree.
As long as there are lots of JC tapes on the scratch list, I believe the
default algorithm is to round-robin the scratch list, so the old tapes that
free up will likely be at the bottom of the scratch list and will likely not
get used befor
2:46 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] 3584 upgrade: 3592-E05 to 3592-E07
I'm not sure the problem is as bad as you think. Automatic tape libraries tend
to manage scratch tapes first-in first-out in an effort to distribute tape wear
evenly. My guess is that your library wil
homas Jefferson University Hospital
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Rhodes, Richard L.
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 12:19 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] 3584 upgrade: 3592-E05 to 3592-E07
Hi,
This weekend we are upgr
, Richard L.
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 11:19 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] 3584 upgrade: 3592-E05 to 3592-E07
Hi,
This weekend we are upgrading all of our tape drives (in 2 libraries) from
3592-E05 (TS1120) to 3592-E07 (TS1140).
The libraries currently have a mix of JA and JB media
Hi,
This weekend we are upgrading all of our tape drives
(in 2 libraries) from 3592-E05 (TS1120) to 3592-E07 (TS1140).
The libraries currently have a mix of JA and JB media.
We will be migrating over time to all new JC media.
JA tapes are READONLY on 3592-E07 drives.
JB tapes are READ/WRITE on
