YES.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Lawrence Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 8:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ACCESS based TSM queries
It seems that a number of people use ACCESS to query TSM. I'm wondering if
people on the list would
Dominique:
My experience with TSM and a VTS (3494 configed as 3490e models) has been
mixed. VTS is great for multiple mount points. Performance penalties do
apply. IMO limited for more than occasional use. Costs with *SM data
involve VTS thrashing and cache flush. Our take is VTS is TMM in-a-b
Here is a "Disaster-Recovery" testing question: we are attempting to
practice restoring the server then restoring a client from the restored ADSM
server. My current quandry lies in server-clinet names; the LAN techs say
we cannot define a test client with the same name as the test box lives in
t
A further note: Our site uses ADSM 3.1.2 and DRM on OS/390 v2.4 with DFrmm
(a CA-1 work-alike). In the daily housekeeping sequence for ADSM a DRM
command updates the ADSM offsite volume inventory and also creates a set of
commands to update the RMM inventory. The ADSM command "MOVE DRMEDIA *
WHE
