PMR 21776,077,724

2004-09-15 Thread Weichler, Stefan
Cc: Weichler, Stefan; Grunenberg, Renar; Mainz adsm Betreff: PMR 21776,077,724 Hallo, es geht um den TSM PMR 21776,077,724. Ich hatte Ihnen am 18.08.2004 eine eMail zu diesem PMR geschrieben und darin um weitere Daten gebeten. Leider habe ich bis heute keine Antwort auf meine eMail erhalten

Re: TSM 5.2.3.1 SMUTIL Problem

2004-08-12 Thread Weichler, Stefan
.2 to handle the Win2003 SYSTEM STATE backups. My options may be limited, but I don't think I want to jump into the frying pan you are in. Matt -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Weichler, Stefan Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004

TSM 5.2.3.1 SMUTIL Problem

2004-08-10 Thread Weichler, Stefan
Hello, last week we updated our 6 TSM-Sever at the mainframe (z/OS 1.4) to 5.2.3.1. Today we found following errors in our actlog: 2004-08-09 22:30 ANRD SMUTIL(12815): ThreadId<10591> Session 5837 attempted to associate itself with the wrong node Callchain follows: pkShowCallChain+2E2 <

AW: More versions of imagebackups

2004-06-22 Thread Weichler, Stefan
olicy domain and u have't specified anything at client level,by default all backups of that client will go to the defaultmanagement class. so check the .opt file of the client for proper mgmt class . "Weichler, Stefan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, i`m very new in TSM

More versions of imagebackups

2004-06-21 Thread Weichler, Stefan
Hello, i`m very new in TSM yet. I have following problem or question: Our Windows-Team do Imagebackups of some of their boxes. When they look at the GUI they see only one version of Imagebackups. (In inactive view too.) They use no special managementclass but also our standard-managementclass f