DU
Subject: Re: HSM for Windows
Weeks, Debbie wrote:
> The problem is that to satisfy customer requests for archived data, it
> has to stay on disk. Tape retrievals take too long. We would prefer
> a hierarchical system that would allow, for example, files not touched
> in 6 months
pool
6 months later. The file type scratch volumes will be freed and so you will
have only a net of 6 months worth of migrated files stored on TSM disk.
Thanks,
Bill Colwell
Draper Lab
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Weeks,
Debbie
Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:49:33 -0400, "Weeks, Debbie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Thanks. We are HIGHLY disappointed with this product.
When I heard about it ( Long Time Ago: Last Oxford ) my comment was that it is
not really like anything that I've seen labeled HSM before.
D] On Behalf Of
Allen S. Rout
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 9:10 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: HSM for Windows
>> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:49:33 -0400, "Weeks, Debbie"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Thanks. We are HIGHLY disappointed with this product.
Whe
DSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: HSM for Windows
Weeks, Debbie wrote:
> I have not sent anything to this list in quite some time, so please be
> gentle if this topic has been thoroughly discussed in this forum
before.
> We are running TSM 5.3.4.0 on AIX, and recently purchased HSM to
>
If we had known that we would not have purchased the product. We must
have downloaded the wrong set of documentation when we were reviewing
the product. It appears that the only thing that HSM gets us is a stub
file, making an archived file recallable by the end user. Everything
else we could ha
I have not sent anything to this list in quite some time, so please be
gentle if this topic has been thoroughly discussed in this forum before.
We are running TSM 5.3.4.0 on AIX, and recently purchased HSM to archive
from our Windows 2003 file servers.
In following the instructions to implement
This is great information, thanks! We had found the information on the
commtimeout from some of your previous posts on another forum, but the
status of the session continued to throw us off track.
Thanks again,
Debbie
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
We are also experiencing this same issue with the TDP SQL client. We
just restored a 41 GB database in about an hour and a half. We
previously had cancelled the restore several times because the session
was in a SendW, and we thought it was hung. Then it failed because it
timed out after an hour
Thanks Steve. We have used the expire command, but this only seems to
mark them inactive. Because the management class they are assigned to
holds the only version forever, or until it knows the file has been
deleted, they are marked inactive, but never go away. Any suggestions
for completing the
I have not seen a response to this question, and I have a similar
situation. We had noticed that our filespaces for our Oracle DB backups
keep growing in leaps and bounds, and it finally became clear that they
were growing faster than would be expected in consideration of the
number of databases w
Can someone point me to a list that details exactly what files are
included in the system files under system objects?
I have several W2K servers that can't back up the system files, causing
the nightly backups to fail and the scheduler service to stop (even if
it is set to restart on failure).
dy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence
saved correctly the first time.
-Original Message-
From: Weeks, Debbie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 11:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: W2000 client passwords
I had used the updatepw function. Showpw is telling me that there is no
password in the reg
: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 11:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: W2000 client passwords
When you connect with the GUI, does it prompt you for password? If not,
then the password IS being saved.
-Original Message-
From: Weeks, Debbie [mailto
mean you used dsmcutil showpw
/node:"nodename".
Also, verify that there is not a nodename specification in your DSM.opt that
is different than what you are expecting.
-Original Message-----
From: Weeks, Debbie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:19 AM
I now have two W2K clients that cannot be backed up by automated backups
because somehow the password has become corrupted. I have done everything I
can think of short of deleting or renaming the node in TSM. I have deleted
the service, uninstalled the client software, edited the registry and
ma
My CE just finsihed putting the latest microcode on the drives. You would
not belive the difference this made! My databse backup that had been taking
4 HOURS completed in 10 MINUTES right after the code was applied.
Perfomance improvement is an understatement!
I executed the command to write to
Thanks! I have put in a call to my CE.
-Original Message-
From: Leopold Hameder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 4:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LTO Performance
Debbie,
Below a posting from a few weeks ago.
LTO Microcode - Perf Improvement
From: arh
I am going to contact my CE so that he can come and take a serious look at
this. I had realized that performance was poor, but not really how poor
until I ran that command. We had trouble with the SCSI adapter once before,
so he can take another look at that. These 6 tape drives are all we have
We didn't migrate from our old 3466 to the new one. We installed the new
3466 as an additional system and we will get rid of the old one when all of
the data we have stored on it has expired. It is not worth very much, so we
really don't mind having it sit around for a while. So, it really wasn
Thanks for all your tips. I will contact my CE to see if we have the latest
microcode update (we just installed the device in late February). I ran the
test suggested as follows:
timex dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rmt1 bs=1024 count=1000
The result was real 21.06 seconds. This falls way short of w
I have not been monitoring the list for a while, so forgive me if I ask
something that has been covered previously...
We recently upgraded our 3466 model A01 with two 3575 tape libraries to a
3466 model C01 with a 3584 tape library. We also upgraded from ADSM 3.1.1
to TSM 4.1. I have begun to n
23 matches
Mail list logo
