know
and I'll try to help you further.
Thanks!
--Justin Richard Bleistein
Unix/TSM System Administrator
|-+------>
| | "Slaughter, Bill" |
| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| |
We are trialing TDPO so I can't call in for support yet.
This was working and starting today we are having trouble.
We started getting the following message when using TDPO.
RMAN> crosscheck backup;
RMAN-00571: ===
RMAN-00569: ===
I am using both the HP Tape Device Driver (GENERICTAPE) and the new TSM Tape
Device Driver (DLT - Format DLT35) both formats are being used in the same
library.
Some of the drives have been converted to the new TSM Device driver and some
remain GENERIC DLT.
I keep getting the TSMDEVICE tapes
David,
One option is to do a q content for each DISK volume.
i.e. q content VVV copied=no
This will list files that have not made it to offsite storage pools.
I have a unix script that loops through mine every morning to make sure
everything gets copied. When it is complete the script exits
I did not swremove anything in my last upgrade from 4.2.3.2 to 5.1.6.0,
5.1.6.5, and now 5.1.7.2. I just double checked my upgrade word document to
verify this.
I am working with support on a HIGH CPU (80%-90% per drive) issue (Since
5.1.6.5) using the TSM Tape Device Driver, so If I were you I wo
glance? I'll be happy to run
the same tests and post my results. Hoe did you test the stape driver?
With TSM 5.1.7.2, or are you comparing to the "old" config? Or stand-alone
drives?
Regards
Robin Sharpe
Berlex Pharmaceuticals
|-+------
I have just had a call escalated to level 2 and was wondering if anybody
else is having a problem and may not know it. I was told I was the first to
report it.
We have recently upgraded to TSM 5.1.7.2 and noticed there is a higher
amount of CPU being consumed by the DSMSERV process. We were upgr
We do collocate at the filespace level and we have a Shell script that bumps
up the maxscratch values to the number of tapes we want to be able to
recover from. To save tape mounts we base the number on the number of drives
and Recovery System Drives). We do have to run this script periodically
thr
I have been reading the documentation and would like "The List" to confirm
my readings that there is no way around this "feature" (shy of splitting the
nodes data up). Please refrain and HOLD back any "You Should Upgrade Your
Hardware" comments since I am looking for an interim solution till I can
I have an upgrade doc for my HP system you are welcome to have if you want?
I just upgraded from 3.7 to 4.2.2.5 on HP-UX 11.0.
I know there are some subtle differences.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Ganu Sachin, IBM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 3:11 AM
I run something similar every day.
I have 1 devclass per library and the command works fine without duplicating
the count of scratch tapes.
Do you have multiple device classes in the same library? My scratch are not
assigned to a specific device class they are scratch for the entire library.
If
I am planning the configuration of another TSM server with another tape
library (Similar to my first one).
I am worried about our operators accidentally inserting "library-1" good
tapes (i.e. offsite) into the other "library-2" as scratch. The TSM server
will add them to the "scratch" pool.
Does
Yes, you can put this in a file and call it like a macro or define a script
similar to this one I run.
I call it Q_LIBSPACE
define script q_libspace "select volume_name, stgpool_name, pct_utilized
from volumes where volume_name in (select volume_name from libvolumes)"
description='Query Library
I have an unexplained message from the dsmerror.log
My Client is 3.7.2.01 NT 4.0 SP 6
I get the following message:
9/22/2000 14:55:19 Unable to open Acknowledgement Mailslot
'\\.\mailslot\client'.
I have not been able to find anything out on this...any ideas.
Bill Slaughter
T
Yes (from memory):
Same restored Data, Sort of, each time we improved the process.
The data is from an Oracle database (Not using EBU) and is about 36-39 4GB
mount Points. i.e. 130GB of Oracle Database Data. (Actual ADSM STGP size
50GB)
Same server: each time.
RS6K R50 AIX 4.3.3 ADSM 3
The largest restore I have done was 144GB and since Oracle databases
compress real tight there was not that much data actually transferred (Less
than 60 Gig).
In our experience, it all depends on the speed of the client, what we do is
run a script that will submit "N" sessions (1 For each Mount p
The "MOVE DATA" will attempt to mount and move any data if the tape is
accessible and readable.
If you are using DRM and the tape is a copypool tape (Offsite) the move data
will locate the primary storage pool tape and move the data from it. Failing
that, you could use Restore volume xxx to r
Do you have DRM?
Did you want to test your Recovery Plan File (While you still can)
instructions?
This is foremost on my mind since I have a DR test scheduled next month for
my ADSM server. We will be going over our instructions with a fine tooth
comb.
> -Original Message-
> From: Guill
I had a script to move the tapes that are full to a not mountable state.
Is your data on these non-full tapes not critical that you can afford them
to be onsite in the event of a disaster?
I combined my offsite storage pools (to reduce tapes used) into 2 separate
storage pools for DRM. (PROD_OFF
Issue a move data
The data will be found on the primary pool tapes.
> -Original Message-
> From: John A. Morgan [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2000 11:26 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Bad CopyPool Tape
>
> How does one recreate data on a destroyed copyp
Joyce,
Do you not have room in your library for these scratch tapes? or Just want
to retain your copies longer than the original?
If you have data for long term storage you could just export that data or
place them in storage pools that are managed manually.
Bill
> -Original Message-
21 matches
Mail list logo
