Re: Performance again!!!

2002-05-18 Thread Sandra Ghaoui
hello, no it couldn't, because we calculated it excluding the mounting time when the data started to be transfered and written to the tape Thx Sandra --- "Fletcher, Leland D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A comment about performance being 9 minutes to tape > and 75 seconds to disk. > Is it

TSM server on a NAS device

2002-05-16 Thread Sandra Ghaoui
Hello again, I've read somewhere that it's possible to install TSM server on a NAS system but only to perform local backups ... I can't find this again!!! All the papers I'm finding put the TSM server on another machine... Does anyone know if NAS support a server to be installed on it? thx a lo

Re: Performance again!!!

2002-05-16 Thread Sandra Ghaoui
Hello, we didn't try that one ... Is there any reason for the migration from disk to tape to be faster than backup from disk to tape? thx Sandra --- Zlatko Krastev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How long does the migration to tape take after > backup to disk? > > Zlatko Krastev > IT Consultant >

Performance again!!!

2002-05-16 Thread Sandra Ghaoui
Hello everybody, It seems like TSM performance problems will neer end!!! Here is the new problem: The customer is running TSM 4.2.1.0 on a Windows 2000 server machine . An IBM rack case 82XX which contains a Quantum DLT8000 tape drive is connected to the server. The driver version for the Quan

Re: Tuning TSM

2002-05-15 Thread Sandra Ghaoui
Hello Ignacio, I had performance problems with TSM too. (I still have in another installation too :p) ... After fixing the networks problems (to 100/full duplex) performance was still poor. I don't know what version you are using but in my case I had to change the TCPWINDOWSIZE in the client opt

NAS backup

2002-05-14 Thread Sandra Ghaoui
Hi all, I'm getting back again with a performance problem !! TSMServer 4.2.1 WIN2k TSM client 4.2.1 WIN2k- NAS system I want to perform a backup of the NAS on a DLT8000 tape. I am having performance problems ... I tried a backup of a sample of 300M. Using windows backup utility it takes 1 min

Using stgpool without physical connection

2002-05-07 Thread Sandra Ghaoui
Hi all, is it possible to use a tape drive even if it's not physically connected to the server?? thx you Sandra __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com

Strange tape behaviour !!!

2002-05-01 Thread Sandra Ghaoui
Hi all, first I have to thank all those who replied to my previous qustions ... Very strange tape behaviour I need to report. I perform a backup directly on tape. What is sometimes happening is that TSM decides the tape is full and marks it as unavailable!!! And the tape is just at 15% of its ca

Re: Recovering from a disaster ....

2002-04-30 Thread Sandra Ghaoui
iles (I always allocate > them the same size as they > were), the device configuration file is nice (just > about necessary). > With that info you can get back your environment as > long as you have your > tapes. > > Dwight E. Cook > Software Application Engineer III > S

Recovering from a disaster ....

2002-04-30 Thread Sandra Ghaoui
Hello everybody, I have one more question ... is it possible to recover from a disaster just by having the TSM database backup and our data backup on tapes? I've been reading about the Disaster Recovery Manager and if I got it right, I would need to have copy storage pools to recover from disaste

TSM Reporting tool

2002-04-30 Thread Sandra Ghaoui
Hi all, do you know if there's any reporting tool integrated with TSM? The customer doesn't want to install TDS ... thx you Sandra __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com

TDP performance!!!!!

2002-04-26 Thread Sandra Ghaoui
Hi everybody, I'm having BIG performance problems using TDP for Lotus Domino... I am backing up the mail databases using TDP for Lotus Domino. My configuration is the following: -TSM Server 4.2.1 on a AIX 4.3.3 -TSM client 4.2.1 and TDP for Lotus Domino 1.1 on the mail server that is a WIN2000