Marc
check your path, ...\baclient must be in the PATH.
rv
- Original Message -
From: "Marc Lowers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 2:59 PM
Subject: DSMCUTIL Problem
> I've just upgraded one of our NT 4 clients to v4.1.2.12, seems everythings
Hi Pétur,
Chez for functionnalities, platform support and you will quickly notice that
Omniback is to TSM, what MS-Access is to Oracle...
You can not compare two solutions that are not in the same category
Good luck woth your customers... but think also about your backup
Administrators...
Hi Marc,
You NT seems not to be at the right SP level. Check the Readme.txt in the
4.1.12 install
You should install 4.2.0.1 or 4.1.2.17 instead
Rv
- Original Message -
From: "Marc Lowers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 3:57 PM
Subject: Upgr
Hello Maurice
try to delete volume history entries
tsm > del volh type=backupset todate=today
rv
- Original Message -
From: "Maurice van 't Loo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:46 AM
Subject: URGENT: How to delete backupsets
> Hi,
>
>
Hi Geoff
have a look at the summary table, my script is :
def scr sz_summ desc=' - Display information for client node sessions'
upd scr sz_summ "select entity as node_name, date(start_time) as date, -"
upd scr sz_summ "cast(activity as varchar(10)) as activity, time(start_time)
as start, -"
Hi Eric
You can search the DB with the following command
TSM > select hl_name, ll_name from backups where node_name='FOO' and
filespace_name='/var'
Good luck,
PS: I suppose tou file is a real one, not a symbolic link and not excluded
...
Rv
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Winters"
Hi Wolfgang,
You tell us, you only have 1 client, so it is not a collocation problem...
Have you looked deeper into your tapes ?
Some of them could be in readonly mode ? Check the last time you write
something to your tapes .
TSM > select volume_name,stgpool_name,date(last_write_date) as WRITE_
Hi Eugene,
What did you put for the REUSEDELAY parameter ? Your tapes are not returned
to scratch status
for "reusedelay' days
Herve
- Original Message -
From: "Eugene Awyong - Singapore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 12:23 PM
Subject:
Hi Bert,
Yes there are !
If you TSM server is dédicated, depending on how much RAM you have, you can
adjust the ram used by TSM to ALL minus the network buffers you want.
Here is a sample for one of my small TSM Servers (256 MB RAM, 1 Eth 100, 1
Eth 10)
% no -a
thewall = 8192=
Hi Bert,
there is a bug for the 'elapsed time' in one client version.
What is your TSM client version on your big S70 ?
rv
- Original Message -
From: "Bert Moonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:06 PM
Subject: Archive/Compression
> Hello
Hi Geoff,
TSM 4.2 (coming soon this summer), will support NDMP v1.0
rv
- Original Message -
From: "Gill, Geoffrey L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 8:03 PM
Subject: Network Appliance
> Can someone contact me who knows the particulars of the N
You mean, you have some files bigger than several GB ? or several tens of GB
?
or do you use old 3480 tapes ?
rv
- Original Message -
From: "Vibhute, Bandu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 9:56 PM
Subject: Backup of Big files
> Hi All,
>
> Does
Hi Shekhar,
Have you installed SAR and IOSTAT ?
SAR like SVMON needs to write in a particular directory, which must exists
before launching the command
If yes, test if you can run them without any permission pb;
root # sar 2 10
Haven't you reached your Ulimit ?
I will check this tomorrow,
kee
Hi Jon,
Here is mine, it works fine and exclude all the useless stuff.
To check the rulez TSM undestand, type the following in a client console
session
dsmc > q inclexcl
or
dsmc > show inclexcl
(depending on your client version)
TCPBUFFSIZE 32
TCPWINDOWSIZE 63 * fenetre TCP > 64K
Hi Mark,
1) when issuing q logvol f=d, you see the main and copy volumes.
just delete the copy vols as normal volumes. In your case, it seems your
copy vols are damaged ...
adsm > del logvol h:\tsmdata\log_copy.dsm
If you can't do this, do a FULL backup db before, it will free some locks on
th
Hi again,
Ok, your are not a Cmdline guy, let me help you,
on your adsm console, send me
adsm > q sched * DAILY_INCR f=d
adsm > q node f=d
on your client console (dsmc), send me
dsmc > q inclexc
or
dsmc > show inclexcl (depending on your client version 3.7 or 4.1)
bye
rv
- Original
Hello Joyce,
Whhoooaaa !! 3.1.2.2. I was at this version in october 98 !
You should really think about applying at least 3.1.2.90 !
I don't understand your question. You what to change the time
on your ADSM server ? Change it under NT and stop/start ADSM
What's wrong ?
rv
- Original Messa
Hi Arthur,
Ok you backup many data at night. Your TSM Server is 100% CPU loaded during
backup.
how many concurent sessions have you set (q status). Isn't your server too
much stressed
at a time ? Have you tuned it (memory, network option, JFS buffers ?)
Rv
- Original Message -
From:
Hi James,
If I understand well, every week, you backup 160 GB of data to new tapes
that are taken offsite ?
Have you tried to use backup STG. This command only put offsite the new
files. Say you have
1% of new files, you only have to offsite some GB and not some hundred GBs.
You do not need
to p
Of course !
But you won't take advantage of all the 4.1 goodies !
Really think about upgrade to TSM 4.1
rv
- Original Message -
From: "Ofer Nachom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2001 7:40 PM
Subject: TSM Client 4.1 TSM Server 3.1.
> Hi There,
>
>
Hi there,
give us more details about your logs and apply latest PTF 3.1.2.90 to your
server.
125 MB is not a big file !
what are the log messages (server-side and client side) ?
dsmc > q backup -ina /your_parth/* ?
rv
- Original Message -
From: "ABDULSALAM ABDULLA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello there
some hints...
re-read your REGEXP definition, you do NOT need to put many lines
* and *.* are EXACTLY the same for *SM
try to use exclude.dir instead of /.../, *SM won't store directory
definitions.
rv
- Original Message -
From: "Gerrit van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <
22 matches
Mail list logo