(TSM server 5.1.6.5 on AIX 5.1)
So, does anyone use AIXASYNCIO ?
Apparently there is no success story yet to be found
in the archives or on the net. So please, raise your hands!
Wolfgang J. Moeller, Tel. +49 551 201-1516/-1510, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GWDG, D-37077 Goettingen, F.R.Germany |Dis
(TSM server 5.1.6.5 on AIX 5.1 with essentially standard options)
>From observing DSMSERV's I/O behaviour via "topas",
I get the impression that it *writes* to the database volumes
(currently 14 files each covering a whole JFS-mirrored SSA disk)
in essentially single-threaded fashion, i.e. never e
(TSM server 5.1.6.5 on AIX)
Did anyone find a way to clear a client node's PASSwordEXPiration time
(once it's inadvertently set by some admin), so as to re-establish
the server-wide default value?
A commands like the following doesn't work for me:
UPDATE NODE ... PASSEXP=""
Strangely, the ser
Maybe someone on the list has experienced a similar thing
and can jump in ...
TSM server v5.1.5.4 on AIX 5.1 ML4.
8 AIT3 (SCSI) tape drives connected to an [ADIC] "SNC" converter ->
-> Brocade FC switch -> dedicated HBA on the AIX system.
Server works fine most of the time. However, about onc
I've been testing a "remote Copypool" setup,
and now want to clean up ...
As the last thing on the (temporary) source server,
I deleted all virtual volumes, and checked via
RECONCILE VOLUMES that they were all (logically) gone.
On the target server though, I still have the non-empty
archive files
Patrick Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not sure about TSM support but there are a couple of ways around the problem.
> Either use hexedit on dsmc and add reseirfs to the list of valid filesystems
> or use virtual mount points.
Patrick, could you please clarify (at least for me)
how to mak
Some of our clients have deployed LINUX (SuSE 7.0) systems
that make use of the (rather new) "reiserfs" file system.
It pretty much seems that the 4.1 TSM client can't handle this type
of file system - it acts like the affected file systems didn't exist.
Is TSM support for "reiserfs" planned in
None of the two (2) replies that I got made it to the list ...
thanks anyway to the contributors.
>From that little traffic, do I assume correctly that
server-to-server copypools are rarely being used?
Still, I'd be grateful for further *sizing* and configuration hints.
On 26-OCT-2000 09:54, I
It has been proposed that we "mirror" rather large
(>1 TB) Storagepools on another server.
Is anyone doing this? I'd like to know about experiences,
in particular with respect to media consumption on the
secondary site, and ideas how to choose the MAXCAPACITY
of virtual volumes (in relation to ta
