Re: need include/exclude help

exclude D:\dir1\dir2\* -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Lists Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 1:10 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: need include/exclude help I'm a big dope when it comes to include/exclude statements ... not su

Re: Gig utilization during backups

We have a z/OS.e 1.6 OS running in an LPAR on a zSeries (z890-270) using a single (shared CP) engine, single (shared) gigabit Ethernet (OSA Express) adapter port. We're running a 31-bit TSM server (that's all there is for us thus far) - 5.2.6.2. I mention this because this TSM server is running i

Re: 3592 tape read performance

In addition to Richard Sims' consistently excellent and insightful response, one should also ensure that the microcode/firmware levels are up to date - but "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" also applies, as well. We have noticed significant behavioral differences between microcode/firmware levels

NT Privilege problem

A user is getting "ANS4974E a required NT privilege is not held." messages when they attempt to ARCHIVE a file through the TSM client Archive GUI. The TSM client is a Windows 5.3.2.0 (i.e., the client that was on the ftp site under the \maintenance\ path as of yesterday) and is running on Windows

Re: Migration -> Primary and Copy Pool

Bruno, That is because simultaneous write only comes into play during certain operations. Simultaneous write is not implemented for migration operations performed by the server. Read the section of the Adminstrator's Guide entitled "Using the Simultaneous Write Function to Protect Your Data". H

Re: Cache Hit % below 99%

Joni, I suspect that, after the "Total Buffer Requests" hits a million or two, the statistics should report a better "Cache Hit Pct.". The more I/O to the database, the better the reported "Cache Hit Pct." should become - assuming a "normal" workload, access pattern, etc. Also, is this server ex

Re: 3592 tape costs

$220 should be close enough for planning purposes. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Bullock Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 5:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 3592 tape costs Anybody out there know a ballpark cost of the n

Re: Cancel process enhancement.

I think this is an excellent idea, but I'd much rather see "result set processing" supported in a new scripting language - let's say REXX. The world is already too complex and REXX is simple yet powerful enough to provide everything one could ever - ...well, let's not go that far... - but you get

Re: icon disappeared from upgrading to TSM 5.2.0.3

Eliza, If the CAD has not been configured (via dsmcutil or wizard) and started on the machine in question, then there's no TSM client service to "do" the listening - and the GUI B/A client does not listen, either. You can verify with netstat, like Ted said. The CAD service, when installed via th

Re: icon disappeared from upgrading to TSM 5.2.0.3

Hello, Eliza. Yes, I have also seen this behavior (with the 5.2.0.1 client). Regarding the Client Acceptor Daemon (CAD) listening on port 1581, after running the wizard, I change the MANAGEDSERVICES statement in dsm.opt from "WEBCLIENT SCHEDULE" to simply "SCHEDULE" (because, of course, I use the

Re: OS390 TSM Performance questions.

Hello, Bill. I fully concur with your statement - i.e., that "As has been pointed out..., unless you know how to interpret the numbers, they're just that - a bunch of numbers.". This tool (i.e. show memu SHORT) has a very limited and specific use. It is intended for "internal use only" by the TS

Re: OS390 TSM Performance questions.

Hello, Al. We have much to share. We are OS/390 2.10 on a 7060-H50 (~120 MIPS) with approx. 100Mbit network connectivity and have had many, long-standing TSM performance problems. We are currently running 4.2.3.2. We have discovered in working with TSM support (without a technical explanation a

Re: Diskpool error

Tommy, the following must be true for the situation in question: 1. the disk storage pool in question has CACHE turned on 2. COMPRESSION=YES is in effect for the client in question 3. COMPRESSALWAYS=NO is NOT in effect for the client in question 4. the file being backed up at the time of the error

Re: Future of mainframe TSM

Hello, Thomas. We run a 4.2.3.2 TSM under OS/390 2.10, also. We run it on a tiny little 7060-H50 (Multiprise 3000) and have an approximately 110mb/sec network connection (that's a bandwidth measurement - not a theoretical number). Furthermore, we run our OS/390 in a V=R virtual machine under z/VM