performance may be degraded" was an
understatement, and canceled process
Oct 10 10:15 After a second night of failed backups, rebooted the server
No problems since.
Our activity log goes back 90 days, and there are no other occurrences
of messages 0536 or 0538.
Chet Osborn
Staff Systems P
as a normal TSM client , "q files" shows shows a filespace
type of "API:LFS FILESYSTEM" and a filespace name of
/backup_afs_volume_dumps, but q backup shows nothing.
Chet Osborn
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
similar setup provide any statistics on how this works
> in the real world, i.e. MB/sec or GB/hour from disk to tape.
>
> A test migration of 259 GB (152422 files) took 10.5 hours to
> complete. This seems like abysmally slow performance, or is it
> reasonable with a large numbers of
rsion: 5.1
Chet Osborn
Systems Programmer
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Oops. Thanks for pointing me toward the activity log again. It turns out
that the problem was "IdleTimeOut" after all. I was looking for a server
message with aapproximately the same timestamp as the client lost
connection message.
dsmsched.log, with the server activity log entry in bold:
11/16/04
st; initializing session reopen
procedure.
11/16/04 03:06:57 Successful incremental backup of '/ess36'
Chet Osborn
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
on another server.
Thanks again.
Chet Osborn
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
At 01:51 PM 3/17/2004 -0700, Ben Bullock wrote:
Yuck. Yes this would be possible if your DB and your
environment is small.
With your scenario, between steps 3 and 5, no clients can
connect to the TSM server
there any way of
restoring them?
Chet Osborn
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
extended support until (I believe) the end of this year.
I have opened an IBM Support, but I haven't had an answer yet. If I do, I
will post it here.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Chet Osborn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, Janua
are of any potential problems?
2) The TSM 5.1.5 client README.AFSDFS file states
NOTE: The AFS/DFS versions of TSM executable files are only available for
AIX. 4.3.X
Is this just referring to removal of the dsmafs/dsmcafs client, or is there
an AFS/butc problem upgrading to AIX 5.1?
Chet
uot;, I don't see anything else that looks
strange. Anyone have any idea what's going on here?
Thanks.
Chet Osborn
Systems Programmer
NT/Central Servers
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
them.
We don't have Disaster Recovery Manager licensed, so that limits our
options somewhat.
Any guidance would be appreciated.
Chet Osborn
Staff Systems Programmer
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
12 matches
Mail list logo
