I agree, while we've done backups and restores of client data over NFS, I
would be very leery of using it as a backend for storage pool data. I
suspect you'll run into a conflict between what is safe (i.e. caching
policy for dirty buffers) and what will perform well. Using something like
NFS v4.1 m
Hi Ricardo,
You may leave the list at any time by sending a "SIGNOFF ADSM-L" command
to LISTSERV AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU (or LISTSERV@MARIST.BITNET).
Regard, Uwe
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Im Auftrag von Ribeiro,
Ricardo
Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. August 2022 15:5
Hi Zoltan
Thanks for your inputs. We have no plan to use as File device class and may
be not good idea to use either directory container stg pool. Currently we
are using S3 as target for long term storage and looking for some other
alternatives as we have stored more than 8 PB and don’t want to be
Hi Marc
Thanks for the quick response. We do use block storage as per ibm blue
print for backup workloads and looking for NFS storage as directory
container for long term retention. Thanks for the suggestions and
appreciate your response.
Regards
Sarav
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 9:04 PM, Marc Lantei
We have had lots of issues using NFS (ISILON) storage as standard FILE
pools and would never try to use them for containers. Currently we only
use them as overflow/next stgpools (vs active, ingest of backups) since we
simply don't have sufficient, proper storage to handle backups. IBM's
official
Hi Sarav,
For Directory Container Pools, NFS mounted filesystems are not recommended. The
nature of the file I/O of directory container pools doesn't work well with NFS
mounted filesystems.
If you plan to use Directory Container pools, I highly recommend that you
follow the Blueprints, otherwi
Did anyone try using NFS file system as Directory container storage pool ?
is there any drawback to use such options?
we have enough bandwidth 25G to support NFS mount points and its dedicated
for backup servers.
Regards
Sarav
--
Thanks & Regards,
Saravanan
Mobile: +65-8228 4384
Hi Eric,
from my observation updating node to new policy domain is instantaneous no
matter how many files are stored under the node. There is no way that during
this instant operation files are re-bound from no-more-existing-in-new-domain
management class to new domain's default management clas
