Hi Zoltan,
It's fine to upgrade the clients first... you won't see warnings because
the clients know they are talking to a back-level server and will speak
the right "language". The best practice is to upgrade the servers first so
all the certificates are there and it will make sure the securit
Send your request to the listserver, not the list - instructions here:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSGSG7_6.4.0/com.ibm.itsm.client.doc/t_start_subsforums.html
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Zoltan Forray wrote:
> Send your signoff request to the server (lists...@vm.marist.
HI Eric,
This is intentional. See my previous reply.
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 01/04/2018
09:44:42 AM:
> From: "Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM"
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 01/04/2018 09:46 AM
> Subject: Re: Should I u
SIGNOFF ADSM-L
In fact a q server f=d shows Session Security: Transitional, but each time I
log on to the server using the admin command line, my admin userid is getting
updated from transitional to strict! Upd admin transitional works but as soon
as I log on it's being switched back to Strict.
Kind regards,
E
Hi Eric,
Once you connect with a "trusted" client and the certificate is
distributed, the mode is set to back to STRICT. The idea is that
userid/adminid now has the certificate, it must supply it when you
reconnect to verify you are who you say you are.
You could reset the admin back to TRANS
Content preview: Yeah, now that you mention it, we ran into this as well. It
wasn't so serious for us since we already had one of our admin systems
upgraded
to 7.1.8, but it was kind of surprising for the folks that still used the
down-level client. Fortunately there were no dependen
Del,
Thanks for the info. Some of it is useful and I have seen most of it.
I have a question about the reverse i.e. clients who have upgraded to
8.1.2+ and 7.1.8.There was this dire warning in the 8.1.2 upgrade docs
about upgrading your servers before installing 8.1.2 clients or your
backups
>>>admin to sessionsecurity=transitional (strange, this should be the
default...) and now I could start a session successful.
I concur. I remember having this same problem when I upgraded my test
server to 8.1.3 eventhough the docs say "transitional" is the default.
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 8:42 AM
Unsubscribe
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Hi Del,
Well, not really... I'm currently installing a 7.1.8 server and noticed that I
could no longer use a 7.1.7 admin commandline:
ANR0404W Session 22 for administrator ADMIN (Linux x86-64) refused - client is
down-level with this server version.
So I upgraded it to 7.1.8, but it was still n
Here are a few links that might help:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSEQVQ_8.1.2/srv.install/r_srv_knowsec-aix.html
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg22004844
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 01/04/2
I agree with you about the lack of completely clear information.
I have a test server that I upgraded to 8.1.3 and with the default
SESSIONSECURITY
value we had mixed and inconsistent results with the few clients I tested.
We also had to go through the key conversion process even though (IIRC)
doc
I too read all the previous posts, but I still don't know what to do. Your mail
also indicates that your upgrade planning is based on several assumptions and I
think it is really time for IBM to jump in here. I think someone from
development should explain a little bit about the new security des
14 matches
Mail list logo
