A great book is gone. The TSM Administrator's Guide has been obsoleted
as of v7.1.3. Its priceless collection of how-to information has been
scattered to the winds, which basically means it is lost. A pity,
because this book had been a model of complete, well-organized,
documentation.
The "Solutio
Hi Bob,
Using the Operations Center only requires the hub server to be at that
level.
The servers you manage can be at whatever other levels you want.
(The caveat being that often times new features are tied to the data
that is exchanged between the spoke and hub servers.
Those new capabilitie
Wonderful. Security risk in Operations Center 7.1.3.000 that I just installed
- and the only resolution? Upgrade to Operations Center 7.1.4.000 - which just
so happens to require TSM Server v 7.1.4.000. We’ve just installed TSM Server
v 7.1.3.000 in our test environment; upgrade to v7.1.4.000
I have this node with strangely named (for a Windows box) filesystem where
the "$" is missing.
Sort of someone manually renaming it, how could this have happened? Plus,
there is no "Last Backup" date?
Is this filespace of any value? There is over 250GB of backups to delete
if it is determined t
Hi,
Have you tried schedmode=polling?
Another thing you could do is take all power savings away from network
card(s).
Regards,
Sami
On 11 Dec 2015 6:01 pm, "Lee, Gary" wrote:
> Have a client with a new laptop. He installed tsm client tsm 7.1.3.1.
> Set up client acceptor as usual, running as s
Have a client with a new laptop. He installed tsm client tsm 7.1.3.1.
Set up client acceptor as usual, running as system account.
Start acceptor, all appears fine, client sees its schedule, and dsmwebcl.log
ends with
"waiting to be contacted by the server".
However, client misses its backup, eve
Hi Stefan,
For Hyper-V, you can exclude an entire VM,
but you can't exclude an individual disk
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SS8TDQ_7.1.3/ve.hv/r_ve_hv_opt_domainvmfull.html
Adding the ability to exclude an individual disk for Hyper-V
is something we know about and on our lis
Thanks Del,
Do you happen to know if this is a roadmap item?
I'm seeing a steady increase in Hyper-V usage at smaller customer sites and
this features if often used in VMware environments when in-guest backups
are prefered.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:35 AM, Del Hoobler wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> Y
Hi Stef
If you changed such amount of data I am quite sure that db2 realized during
runstats that it should perform some reorg. As its not done during deletion
but after you see impact on db2 a bit afterwards.
Regards
Krzysztof
2015-12-11 11:52 GMT+01:00 Stef Coene :
> On Friday 11 December 2015
On Friday 11 December 2015 10:22:55 you wrote:
> 16 Power8 cores(at least 3.42 GHz) and 192 GB to handle 1000 TB of backup
> data? One would think there was a potential for code efficiency improvement.
I have a copy of our production TSM running on a standby TSM server.
I remove almost all filespac
16 Power8 cores(at least 3.42 GHz) and 192 GB to handle 1000 TB of backup
data? One would think there was a potential for code efficiency improvement.
Hans Chr.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Andrew Carlson wrote:
> That is awesome. Thanks David.
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Nixon, C
11 matches
Mail list logo
