Thank you very much for response.
I agree with you totally, but estimated capacity is wrong in TSM for many
primary pools allocated on Data Domain VTL. For example, for 128 tapes with
size 64GB (max 8192GB) it gives "Estimated Capacity: 18,191 G".
Any comments?
Grigori Solonovitch, Senior System
One note to consider with DataDomain. The tape has no compression from the TSM
perspective. If you create 100GB tapes, the estimated capacity in TSM should
be 100GB. TSM will store 100GB on a tape.
Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST
I will try.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Kamran
Rao
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 4:49 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Issue checking in brand new tapes
I usually label tapes with:
Label libv libraryname
Try audit library and then label + checkin
On Wednesday, 6 August 2014, Kamran Rao wrote:
> I usually label tapes with:
>
> Label libv libraryname search=bulk checkin=scratch labels=barcode
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kamran H. Rao
>
> Senior Network Analyst
>
>
>
> T 519.749.4300 x.2574
>
> -Origin
I usually label tapes with:
Label libv libraryname search=bulk checkin=scratch labels=barcode
Regards,
Kamran H. Rao
Senior Network Analyst
T 519.749.4300 x.2574
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeanne
Bruno
Sent: Augu
Hi all. I'm trying to check in brand new tapes in our TS3310 tape library.
I had a total of 5 brand new tapes, so I put them in the library and did the
'insert media'.
Then typed the server command:
LABEL LIBV TSMxyz SEARCH=YES CHECKIN=SCRATCH LABELS=B OVERWRITE=Y
This resulted in only two of t
Thank you very much for RFE and information. I will try to modify device
classes.
Grigori Solonovitch, Senior Systems Architect, IT, Ahli United Bank Kuwait,
www.ahliunited.com.kw
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Grant
Street
S
