Re: Question about TSM 7.1 Node Replication

2014-03-24 Thread Wolfgang Sprenger
Hi Mike, was looking for the same thing some days ago. Found this in the V7.1 Info Center: Converting client nodes for store operations on a target replication server: If a source replication server is unavailable, you can convert client nodes to be non-replicating nodes. Non-replicating client n

Question about TSM 7.1 Node Replication

2014-03-24 Thread Ryder, Michael S
Hello Folks: I've been searching all day, but haven't been able to find an answer on my own yet. Is anyone using Node Replication on TSM 7.1? I am tasked with coming up with some sort of disaster recovery solution for TSM 7.1 -- we are currently running server v6.2, and I want to take this oppor

Re: File retention

2014-03-24 Thread Nick Laflamme
You don’t have to get rid of all your DISK space. The best practice has been to keep enough DISK space to receive two nights’ worth of backups. That storage pool would be set up so its next storage pool (for MIGRATE STG commands) would be ONSITE. You could keep enough to hold 30 days' worth of d

Re: File retention

2014-03-24 Thread Richard Rhodes
> What I want to accomplish is I want to set the primary pool to keep10 > versions of files for 30 days, and 10 versions of inactive files also for > 30 days, and keep the last version for 30 days, but I want the copy pool > to keep teh last version of an inactive file FOREVER. I know of no way to

Re: File retention

2014-03-24 Thread Tom Taylor
Using this set up doesn't this mean the backups would go to the tape first if the tape pol were the primary pool? Wouldn't that make backups slower? How do I get backups to go to the disk first while still having different expiration for each? Thomas Taylor System Administrator Jos. A. Bank