Forgive me for asking, but is this based on experience? I ask because some
administrative processes aren't that graceful about unavailable tapes.
(RECLAIM STG comes to mind.)
On Friday, November 8, 2013, Shawn DREW wrote:
> I would just mark all the tapes that are not in the library as
> "unavail
The Auto Client Deployment function in the TSM Admin Center has the ability to
connect to the IBM ftp servers and automatically download client packages,
which assists managing large corporate environments.
Unfortunately, large corporate environments will also typically have a web
proxy in orde
I would just mark all the tapes that are not in the library as "unavailable",
then run your "copy activedata". When It finishes, eject as many tapes as you
can and put in other tapes. It will tell you which tapes that were needed, but
were marked unavailable in the actlog. Change the unavaila
That is almost correct. After doing this, shut off the old tsm instance
immediately to make sure there is no conflict for the tapes. (Not sure if you
are using a shared tape environment)
You will first need to format db/log volumes on the new server (with dsmfmt or
use raw logical volumes),
th
Also, look for errors about failed scheduled backups. It may be trying to
prompt a client to back up -- and TSM doesn't expose those particular
settings.
Nick
On Friday, November 8, 2013, Huebner, Andy wrote:
> Look for a node with the TCP/IP name of xxx.
>
> select node_name, tcp_name from node
Look for a node with the TCP/IP name of xxx.
select node_name, tcp_name from nodes where tcp_name='XXX'
Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of r4mzeso
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 5:17 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subje
I am gettin from q actlog
ANR8214E Session open with xxx.domain.com failed due to connection refusal
But the problem is that xxx.domain.com doesn't exists as registered node in TSM.
How can I find this?
+--
|This was sent by r4
I do not think TSM prefers either. I suspect they are very similar in the code
because both are sequential volumes tracked in a similar way.
Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Meuleman, Ruud
Sent: Friday, November 08
Hi Andy,
Yes, we plan to use a de-duplicating storage device for TSM.
Thanks for your responds.
Do you know if the application TSM itself have preference?
Kind Regards,
Ruud Meuleman
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Huebner, A
Hi Nick
It sounds like you are between a rock and a hard place. Are the lawyers
really allowed to obstruct normal operations like that? Not reclaiming
will cause the number of tapes required for a complete restore of a
client to blow out to the point where recovery time would be
impractical.
Does anyone have much experience with active storage pools?
My current customer isn’t allowed to reclaim tapes, so their inventory of
primary storage volumes is much larger than their ATL. This makes client
restores prone to failure because of the number of primary volumes that need
manual inte
Thanks!
Hans Chr.
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Neil Schofield <
neil.schofi...@yorkshirewater.co.uk> wrote:
> Hans
>
> I think most of the information you're looking for is here:
> http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21651364
>
> Regards
> Neil
>
> Neil Schofield
> Infrastructu
Hans
I think most of the information you're looking for is here:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21651364
Regards
Neil
Neil Schofield
Infrastructure Architect, Hardware Engineering
Yorkshire Water
Phone: 01274 372085
Email: neil.schofi...@yorkshirewater.co.uk
13 matches
Mail list logo
