Normally for TSM clients you license to run the client but not a specific
version. So one would not thing that you would be charged again. In the past
one was able to connect a z/os client to a non-z/os server.
The more interesting question is there a 6.1 z/os client. If not will there be
one.
I am license for TSM server on z/OS. Since there is no 6.1 server
available, I can't see how to order just the 6.1 client piece on
shopzseries and not get charge again.
On 5 jun 2009, at 23:32, Clark, Robert A wrote:
TSM server 6.1 supports Windows server on x32 Intel, Linux on x32
not so
much? I just wish the x345 I picked up on CL was 64bit.
For some reason, very early in the project support for 32 bit linux
has been dropped. I know there was at one time a
Sorry for the broken quoting.
>> May I infer then that you have no nodes running recent versions of
>> windows server?
>You may. My TSM servers run on AIX, all the way. I'll include only by
reference my long-term antipathy towards MS products. The price
advantage is gradually making me (whin
>> On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:20:24 -0700, "Clark, Robert A"
>> said:
> May I infer then that you have no nodes running recent versions of
> windows server?
You may. My TSM servers run on AIX, all the way. I'll include only
by reference my long-term antipathy towards MS products. The price
advan
May I infer then that you have no nodes running recent versions of
windows server?
I realize that it take two to tango, and MS has become prodigious at
shitting the bed with broken WMI writers, SNP bugs, setting the default
VSS provider to whatever a third party product installed last and
providin
> I agree with Remco and do believe IBM listened. The 6.1 ISC/AC is a lot
> faster and better organized.
We haven't tried ISC/AC since v5.4 where we gave up on it. But, I did like
some of the things it did. Even thought we are still on v5.4 (upgrading
to v5.5 later this year), we are going to tr
And for all you old timers on the list, there was the same "discussion" when
IBM did away with the original administration Windows application in favor
of the Web admin interface. Everybody hated it and wanted the Winders app
back. Now people hate the new admin facility and want to Web admin
back..
We too tried the ISC, 3-times. Everyone was frustrated/confused with it.
Gave up and purchased TSMManager. We bought it 2-3 years ago and love it.
My operations staff could not fully manage TSM without it.
From:
Grigori Solonovitch
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
06/04/2009 05:01 AM
Subject:
>> On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 15:12:03 -0700, "Clark, Robert A"
>> said:
> It seems that many of us have a parental relationship with the
> product. In any other case, we would likely have severed the
> connection some time ago. going up, audits? You think you're a domestic US car maker?>
The market
I was told by an IBM insider that ISC was written by someone who's daddy
at IBM didn't have anything better for him to do.
Buddy Howeth
Computer Operations Specialist
Information Systems
Pacific Coast Producers
Corporate Offices
631 N. Cluff Ave
Lodi, CA 95240-0756
(209) 367-8800 - Main#
(209) 3
I do a lot of TSM implementations for new customers.
While I usually use the command line myself, I have to say that for NEW
users, the ISC (in the 5.5 or 6.1 version, not the first 2 releases) is
actually much better than the old web GUI when it comes to creating
libraries, drives, and paths, an
>> On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 12:11:20 +0200, Stephan Boldt
>> said:
> Hello everybody,
> [ ... I understand HSM, but the windows HSM product doesn't behave
> as I expect ...]
> Why is this so? What do I have to do to get rid of the deleted file in the
> archive?
Search the logs; I've been ranting
>> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:59:06 -0400, David E Ehresman
>> said:
> Do can a TSM Admin verify that the rman clients are deleting their
> old TSM for Oracle backups?
No. :)
We have to go through a manual (in our case) delete obsoletes process
every few weeks to get old stuff to go away.
- Alle
Hi Robert,
Just change you browser prefered language to french (temporily) and you'll have
the ISC/AC in French.
--
Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي
Erwann SIMON
- Mail Original -
De: "Robert Burton"
À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Envoyé: Mercredi 3 Juin 2009 16h12:09 GMT +01:00 Amster
Hi
I know only TSM client patch requirements:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=1019&context=SSSQWC&context=SSGSG7&q1=solaris&uid=swg21318605&loc=en_US&cs=utf-8&lang=en
Usually during server installation process you will see required patches.
Efim
2009/6/5 Minns, Farren - Chichester
TSM backs up files even if the only change is security. I know there
is a skipntpermissions option but besides that is there any plans
to separate the files from the security within TSM and be able
to merge them back later on if needed. We are attempting to
standardize on AD groups as security as m
Hi all
I know I asked this question before but I still have not found a clear answer.
Is there a list of the required OS patches to run TSM 5.5 on Solaris 9?
I have found all the other information I need, but not that bit.
Regards
Farren Minns
--
Hi *SM-ers!
We are using virtual libraries (EMC DL-series) in our TSM environment
and we will migrate to a new model soon.
I would like to do this without ending up with new names (stgpool,
devclass, library names) in TSM.
Storagepools can be renamed, so I rename the old pool and give the new
one t
19 matches
Mail list logo
