I also find it helpful to use the ODBC driver to check out the table names in
excel.
Thanks,
Mooney
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of David
McClelland
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 12:16 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SV:
Ok Folks, it's working now :)
I was using default RHEL5 java package and apparently this doesn't work with
dsmj.
I've just installed the jre-1.6.0_14 and it works fine :)
Thanks all.
--
Flávio do Carmo Júnior
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Flavio Junior wrote:
> Hi Richard, thanks for your
Hi Richard, thanks for your tip but there is nothing on logs...
I've pasted a tail -f for all logs found while I was accessing the Java
Interface...
That can be read here: http://pastebin.ca/1440087
Maybe someway to increase log verbosity?
Thanks again.
--
Flávio do Carmo Júnior
On Fri, May
mailto:lists...@vm.marist.edu?body=help
On 29 mei 2009, at 16:16, Zeina Khouly wrote:
Hello. Get me out of this email loop please! Iv been stuck in it for
months!
Thanks
--
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Remco Post
r.p...@plcs.nl
+31 6 248 21 622
Try 'BACKUPS', rather than 'BACKUP' as your table name and that should see
you right.
/David Mc
London, UK
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dmcclelland
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Arthur Poon
Sent: 29 May 2009 16:43
To: ADSM-L@VM
But the only problem that remains for IP over FC is that TSM server is still
processes the data coming/going from/to TSM clients/storage pools. I mean it
is not direct copy to SAN. Above all, I loved that.
Regards,
Mehdi Salehi
Doselect * from syscat.tables
to see actual table names.
When I execute the SQL statement I got the following errors
tsm: ADSMSERV>select filespace_name as filespace, hl_name as directory, ll_names
as file_name from backup where node_name='COMAPPS'
ANR2906E Unexpected SQL literal token - 'BACKUP'.
We are running TSM Server v5.5.1.2 on AIX, and have a number of TSM clients
v5.1, 5.2 and 5.3 (principally running on Windows XP systems, but a smattering
of ones running on Mac OS X and Linux and other UNIX systems). So far, so good.
Minns, Farren - Chichester wrote:
Hi All
I'm still running
Hello. Get me out of this email loop please! Iv been stuck in it for months!
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Richard Rhodes
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 5:10 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] SANergy
As I sa
As I said, it technically worked for AIX.
Here are my notes from IBM's web site . . .which BTW, I can't find anymore.
The was ALL I could ever find on setting this up. What it doesn't
describe and is necessary, is that you have to put IP on the SAN switches.
rsfebkup4p:/tsmdata/tsm_scripts/sa
That's a wonderful solution, Richard. I loved that.
Regards,
Mehdi Salehi
Well . . . for AIX I'll throw this out. I have played around (ie: it
technically works) with FCNET devices under the FCS hba device. In other
words, I setup a IP network over our SAN. I did this one time when we had
some network issues and I wanted to make sure our server-to-server
communication
Better and better :-)
Thanks people
Farren
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Steven
Langdale
Sent: 29 May 2009 10:27
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 5.5 and Client Compatability?
Hello
I'm also running 5.3
Hello
I'm also running 5.3 clients against 5.5 Servers with no problems.
Even got two 3.7 clients on some REALLY old kit that also work (so far)
Thanks
Steven Langdale
Global Information Services
EAME SAN/Storage Planning and Implementation
( Phone : +44 (0)1733 584175
( Mob: +44 (0)7876 216782
Wonderful, that's exactly what I wanted to hear :-)
Regards
Farren
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Björn
Rackoll
Sent: 29 May 2009 09:36
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 5.5 and Client Compatability?
Hi Fa
Hi Farren,
So for now I'm just interested to know if other people are running 5.3
> clients with a 5.5 server. Trying to get all of our clients up to 5.4
will be a major undertaking.
we are running a 5.5.1.0 server with (among many other levels) a lot of
5.3 clients. No problems so far.
Reg
Ah, but that's talking about old operating system code as opposed to the TSM
code itself.
I know we are fine from an operating system point-of-view.
Farren
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Steven
Harris
Sent: 29 May 2009 01:
Hi
No, the contract has not lapsed (at least as far as I know), it's just the
usual issue of upgrades being put off (by me) due to so many other commitments,
one thing leads to another, and before you know it you're running an
unsupported server with unsupported clients :-)
I am not really wor
19 matches
Mail list logo