It works well if you understand your data and how you can push to it
with in reason before you deploy another. The IBM product likes more
CPU cores ... Understand these are x86 boxes... We see up to 500MBS
Writes to one of our VTL's that ingests Exchange Backups via the TSM
TDP.
-Original M
What Robert said.
Kelly Lipp
CTO
STORServer, Inc.
485-B Elkton Drive
Colorado Springs, CO 80907
719-266-8777 x7105
www.storserver.com
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of W.
Curtis Preston
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 11:24 AM
To:
Funny.
I would say that BAD dedupe is the enemy of throughput.
There IS good dedupe. I've seen it. It hurts neither backup, nor restore
performance.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Clark, Robert A
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009
On 18/03, Arthur Poon wrote:
> I have a question about aggregate data transfer rate. Why it is always a
> lot slower than the network data transfer rate?
>
> For example:
> ANE4961I (Session: 18137, Node: MFDCITRIX) Total number
> of bytes transferred: 13.61 GB (SESSION: 1813
On Mar 21, 2009, at 12:44 AM, admbackup wrote:
I want to configure DB2 logs backups on a windows server. Where
can I find a good source to implement this?
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg246247.html
